banner_ad

Gap between meetings in a small company

Meetings 485 views 9 replies

Dear All,

As per sec 173, the BOD of a company should meet 4 times a year with a gap of less than 120 days between consecutive meetings.

Would this mean that if a company meets only 4 times a year, with all meetings in one calendar half of the year and no meetings in the other half and there will be full compliance with sec 173?

Would the answer be different if the company in question is a small company - since the requirement of holding only 2 meetings in a year with a meeting in each calendar half with a gap of minimum 90 days is only deemed compliance. that is if a small company holds 4 meetings all in one calendar half, would it be compliance with sec 173?

Regards,

Geetha

 

Replies (9)
if all 4 meetings are held in one calendar half, then gap between 4th meeting and next
will be more than 120 days. also min between 2 meetings in case of small companies shud be 90 days. also Secretarial standard - 1 shud be adhered to

Thanks for this clarification, Ashok ji

Regards,

Geetha

I do not agree with the above view. Section 173(1) specifies -every year. Hence 4th meeting will not be counted for 1st meeting of next year.

Also, 173(5) is a deeming provision. If you are complying with 173(1), 173(5) should not apply.

Yes Ajit Ji, in fact i too tend to have the same view as you do. I asked the ques for clarifiying my views on this.

I feel 173(1) applies to all companies, even for small dormant or one person companies.

Relaxation of 173(5) applies only in those cases, for small dormant or one person companies, where there is not much activity and therefore there is not enough reason for the Board to meet so often. In such cases they may get away with holding just 2 meetings, one in each calendar half of the year, at least 90days apart and still be deemed to have complied with this section.

Regards,

Geetha

Correct. 173(5) is a benefit that can be taken. Thats it. It cannot be said to be complied along with 173(1).

But SS-1 states that board shall meet atleast once in every calendar quarter and the same exemption as 173(5) is available in that standard. It cannot be said to be inconsistent with the act, Thus, the above situation will not be sufficient compliance

I correct myself on quarterly requirement. Mr. Ashok is right.

Guidance note also requires meetings to be held in each quarter. Also the interpretation of year is calender year as per the guidance note.

Thanks Ashok ji for further clarification from you. You have explained the point very well

Regards,

Geetha


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 02 May 2026
Senior Executive

hitesh chandwani & co

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 29 April 2026
Manager- Finance and Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details