Gap between meetings in a small company

574 views 9 replies

Dear All,

As per sec 173, the BOD of a company should meet 4 times a year with a gap of less than 120 days between consecutive meetings.

Would this mean that if a company meets only 4 times a year, with all meetings in one calendar half of the year and no meetings in the other half and there will be full compliance with sec 173?

Would the answer be different if the company in question is a small company - since the requirement of holding only 2 meetings in a year with a meeting in each calendar half with a gap of minimum 90 days is only deemed compliance. that is if a small company holds 4 meetings all in one calendar half, would it be compliance with sec 173?

Regards,

Geetha

 

Replies (9)
if all 4 meetings are held in one calendar half, then gap between 4th meeting and next
will be more than 120 days. also min between 2 meetings in case of small companies shud be 90 days. also Secretarial standard - 1 shud be adhered to

Thanks for this clarification, Ashok ji

Regards,

Geetha

I do not agree with the above view. Section 173(1) specifies -every year. Hence 4th meeting will not be counted for 1st meeting of next year.

Also, 173(5) is a deeming provision. If you are complying with 173(1), 173(5) should not apply.

Yes Ajit Ji, in fact i too tend to have the same view as you do. I asked the ques for clarifiying my views on this.

I feel 173(1) applies to all companies, even for small dormant or one person companies.

Relaxation of 173(5) applies only in those cases, for small dormant or one person companies, where there is not much activity and therefore there is not enough reason for the Board to meet so often. In such cases they may get away with holding just 2 meetings, one in each calendar half of the year, at least 90days apart and still be deemed to have complied with this section.

Regards,

Geetha

Correct. 173(5) is a benefit that can be taken. Thats it. It cannot be said to be complied along with 173(1).

But SS-1 states that board shall meet atleast once in every calendar quarter and the same exemption as 173(5) is available in that standard. It cannot be said to be inconsistent with the act, Thus, the above situation will not be sufficient compliance

I correct myself on quarterly requirement. Mr. Ashok is right.

Guidance note also requires meetings to be held in each quarter. Also the interpretation of year is calender year as per the guidance note.

Thanks Ashok ji for further clarification from you. You have explained the point very well

Regards,

Geetha

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
14 July 2026
Senior Executive/ Manager

H S SHARMA AND CO

Pune

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 July 2026
Article Assistants

R Shyam and Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 16 July 2026
Semi Qualified Company Secretary

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CS

View Details
Company
22 July 2026
Senior Chartered Accountant

SKSS

Patna

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 June 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Senior Account (VA Client Operations)

Karbon Business

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Taxation Content Writer Intern

Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
2 posts Article assistant and Articleship completed students

Chirag N Shah & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details