Menu
Fee U/S 234F
Not correct in charging fees u/s 234F, as the revised return replace the original return and it is deemed to be filed on the date of original return.
Replies (21)
Not correct in charging fees u/s 234F, as the revised return replace the original return and it is deemed to be filed on the date of original return.
If it was made defective then how come you say before passing the order???
If it was made defective and you didn't answer / revised it before expiry of given time then of course order is confirmed and your return will be treated as defective.
If it was made defective and you didn't answer / revised it before expiry of given time then of course order is confirmed and your return will be treated as defective.
No it is incorrect to charge fees u/s 234F
If it is defective then it will be assumed as no return is filed and accordingly department is correct in charging fees u/s 234 F.
It is not correct.
It is not correct
It's not correct, required to be rectify.
Recent Threads
- Utilizing Capital gains in new home construction
- Hi i have some doubt about my microsoft exam?
- Period of holding of residential flat and its acqu
- ITRs for AY 2025-26 filed in September 2025 not pr
- Heard & Seen Around – Your Daily Economi
- Best NISM course for an Accountant
- Calculate IT on LTCG AND STCG for the FY 2025-26
- Heard and Seen Around - Your Daily Economic Quick
- Returning to India - Residency confusion
- About CMP-08
Related Threads
CAclubindia
