Menu
Fee U/S 234F
Not correct in charging fees u/s 234F, as the revised return replace the original return and it is deemed to be filed on the date of original return.
If it was made defective then how come you say before passing the order???
If it was made defective and you didn't answer / revised it before expiry of given time then of course order is confirmed and your return will be treated as defective.
If it was made defective and you didn't answer / revised it before expiry of given time then of course order is confirmed and your return will be treated as defective.
No it is incorrect to charge fees u/s 234F
If it is defective then it will be assumed as no return is filed and accordingly department is correct in charging fees u/s 234 F.
It is not correct.
It is not correct
It's not correct, required to be rectify.
Recent Threads
- ITR filling for legal heir
- How Can I qualify CA Final Exam?
- Wrong reporting on 22 april 2026 under article inc
- Articeship Form 107
- TAN for Multiple States
- Delivery Challan serial number Issue and return ru
- After filing form 71 For TDS mismatch
- UNCLAIMED TDS REFUND QUERY
- Rcm payable which head
- Query of GST
Related Threads
CAclubindia
