Explanation to Sec (2d) introduces the concept of 'deemed marketability'- by providing that 'goods' include any article, material or substance which is capable of being bought & sold for consideration and such goods shall be deemed to be marketable. However, In CCEx V Dhakad Metals Pvt Ltd. (2010) 257 elt E139 (sc), held that – Copper Sldge arising in the process of manfacture of zinc sulphate (agricultural grade) is a ‘waste’. Merely because that can be sold in the market, it doesn’t become marketable; as marketability of product totally different from disposal of waste. My Q. is that since waste is realising consideration , hence by explanation to sec 2(d) it should be deemed marketable whereas SC has different view. Which is more correct ?
Menu
Explanation to Sec 2(d) and SC
Replies (1)
in view of excise, the bye products has two type of destination, 1) disposal by way of sales, 2) disposal by way of destruction, former is applicable if it carry transaction value and appopriate rates of duties and taxes are paid, while the later is subject to destruction in "supervision" of R/O.
Recent Topics :
- Utilising Section 54(F) for capital gains reinvest
- GST ewaybill closure and Bill to ship to GST numbe
- TDS ON PARNTER INTEREST
- Share important chapters of ca inter costing
- Free CA Foundation Study Material - PYQs with Sugg
- INCOME TAX
- Moving from old to new tax regime after notice
- Need urgent help on notice
- ITR-3 - F&O Loss adjusted against business inc
- Error - Blank Rows in Schedule SI (ITR-2)
Related Topics :
CAclubindia
