The Supreme Court has clarified that if a tax return is found to have defects, it is the assessing officer's responsibility to notify the taxpayer and allow them to make corrections. If the officer fails to do this, the return cannot be considered defective. This ruling addresses the legality of reassessing tax returns, particularly when initial filings might be incomplete.
Supreme Court Ruling: Officers Duty in Defective Tax Returns and Legal Validity of Reassessment
The Supreme Court on Tuesday clarified that if a tax return is deemed defective, it is the responsibility of the assessing officer to inform the assessee and provide an opportunity for rectification. T
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Broadcasts
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The assessing officer bears the responsibility to ascertain defects in tax returns and inform the assessee for rectification.
If the assessing officer fails to exercise their discretion to identify and communicate defects, the return cannot be considered defective.
The court addressed the legal sustainability of reopening a concluded assessment (reassessment) under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, after issuing a notice under Section 148.
A return filed without a regular balance sheet and profit and loss account may be deemed defective, but it is not considered invalid.
No, the production of books of accounts or other material evidence that could ordinarily be discovered by the assessing officer does not amount to a true and full disclosure.