Easy Office

Vinod Kumar Jain, Delhi ITO, Ward-47(3), New Delhi


Last updated: 24 December 2020

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-16, New Delhi, Dated 29.04.2019, for the A.Y. 2015-2016.

Citation :
ITA.No.5948/Del./2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCHES “SMC-1” : DELHI

BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND
SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA.No.5948/Del./2019
Assessment Year 2015-2016

Shri Vinod Kumar Jain,
Prop. Vinod Kumar Mahesh
Kumar, 160, Kucha Ghasi
Ram, Fatehpuri, Chandani
Chowk, Delhi – 110 006
PAN ADHPJ5937B
(Appellant) 

[vs.

The Income Tax Officer,
Ward – 47 (3),
New Delhi.
(Respondent)

For Assessee : -None- Application of
Withdrawal filed.
For Revenue : Mr. Shri Prakash Dubey , Sr.DR

Date of Hearing : 21.12.2020
Date of Pronouncement : 21.12.2020

ORDER

PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.

This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-16, New Delhi, Dated 29.04.2019, for the A.Y. 2015-2016.

2. We have heard the Learned Representatives of both the parties through video conferencing and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned Counsel for the Assessee has filed letter stating therein that assessee has opted for VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020 and filed Form Nos.1 and 2. He has, therefore, submitted that appeal of assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn.

To know more in details find the attachment file

 
Join CCI Pro



Comments

CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link