Urmil Bansal, New Delhi ITO, Ward- 45(2), New Delhi

Last updated: 22 December 2020

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-15, Delhi, Dated 31.03.2017, for the A.Y. 2011-2012.

Citation :
ITA.No.4225/Del./2017

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCHES “G” : DELHI

BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND
SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA.No.4225/Del./2017
Assessment Year 2011-2012

Smt. Urmil Bansal,
J-12/13 Rajouri Garden,
New Delhi – 110 027.
PAN AMUPB1207C
(Appellant)

[vs.

The Income Tax Officer,
Ward-45(2), Room
No.1809, 18th Floor, Civic
Centre, Block E-2, J.L.
Nehru Marg, New Delhi.
PIN – 110 002.
(Respondent)

For Assessee : -None-
For Revenue : Shri Vipul Kashyap, Sr. DR

Date of Hearing : 17.12.2020
Date of Pronouncement : 17.12.2020

ORDER

PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.

This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-15, Delhi, Dated 31.03.2017, for the A.Y. 2011-2012.

2. Learned Counsel for the Assessee Shri Anil Kumar Goel forwarded an application stating therein that assessee wants to settle the dispute in Direct Tax VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020 and filed Form Nos.1 and 2, copies of which are uploaded and Form No.3 is yet to be issued.

To know more in details find the attachment file

Summarize this with AI

ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Google AI Grok