Unaccounted Income

Last updated: 02 August 2008

Court :

Brief :

Citation :
C.I.T. Vs. Chana Basha

Decision: Held by the Hon`ble Court that, whenever there is concurrent finding by the below authorities no interference should be called for by the high court
 
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Partners of a Partnership Firm are personally liable for GST dues of the Firm and bank account of an erstwhile partner can be attached for recovery
  2. Prima facie satisfaction and not conclusive proof of fraud is sufficient to invoke Section 74 of the CGST Act
  3. Show Cause Notice issued to a non-existent amalgamated company is void ab initio and cannot be saved by Section 87 of the CGST Act
  4. SC Landmark Ruling: Mechanical Invocation of Fraud Cannot Extend Limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act
  5. CESTAT Sets Aside ₹60 Crore Service Tax Demand: Best-Judgment Assessment Cannot Be Based on Guesswork
  6. CESTAT: Excess Service Tax Paid by Mistake Is a Deposit — Refund Not Barred by Section 11B Limitation
  7. CESTAT Denies Service Tax Exemption on Rent to Educational Institution for Lack of Evidence
  8. CESTAT Upholds Customs Duty Demand on Undervaluation of Imported Goods Based on Chinese Customs Documents
  9. IGST Paid Under a Wrong Head to be Adjusted Against CGST/SGST Liability Before Any Recovery of Tax Interest or Penalty
  10. Assessee entitled to fresh opportunity of hearing where adjudicating authority ignored reply filed to DRC-01A intimation

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member CA TARUN JINDALCA TARUN JINDALPro Member DEEPAK MARAPUREDDYDEEPAK MARAPUREDDYPro Member Anjum AshrafAnjum AshrafPro Member rana andcompanyrana andcompanyPro Member Gurunathan kannanGurunathan kannan
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category