Thyagarajan Rajkumar, Bangalore DCIT, Bangalore

Last updated: 02 January 2021

Court :
ITAT Bangalore

Brief :
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 30.11.2015 passed by Ld CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2011-12.

Citation :
ITA No.138/Bang/2016

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE

BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K., JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND
SHRI B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No.138/Bang/2016
Assessment Year: 2011-12

Thyagarajan Rajkumar
# 715, 10th ‘A’ Main, 4th Block
Jayanagar
Bangalore-560 011.
PAN NO : AGHPR5807M
APPELLANT

Vs.

Deputy Commissioner of
Income-tax
Circle-11(5)(old),
New Circle 1(1)(1)
Bangalore
RESPONDENT

Appellant by : Shri Tata Krishna & Shri Mahesh G., A.Rs
Respondent by : Shri Rajesh Kumar Jha, D.R.

Date of Hearing : 30.12.2020
Date of Pronouncement : 30.12.2020

O R D E R

PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 30.11.2015 passed by Ld CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2011-12.

2. The Ld A.R of the assessee has filed a letter stating that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute in its appeal as well as in the appeal filed by the revenue under Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Accordingly, he has prayed for adjournment.

3. The Ld D.R, however, submitted that the assessee has towithdraw the pending appeal after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. Accordingly he submitted that the appeals of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeal.

To know more in details find the attachment file

Summarize this with AI

ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Google AI Grok