Supply of service sub-contracted by recipient company cannot be considered as intermediary


Quick Summary
The Gujarat AAAR has ruled that services like machine installation and training, sub-contracted by an Indian company (Stovec Industries Ltd.) on behalf of a foreign company (SPG Prints Austria GMBH), are not considered intermediary services. The ruling clarifies that the Indian company is providing a composite supply to the foreign company, not acting as an intermediary between the foreign company and its Indian customers. This decision modifies a previous AAR ruling, establishing the foreign company as the recipient of the services.

Court :
AAAR, Gujarat

Brief :
The AAAR, Gujarat, in the matter of M/S. Stovec Industries Ltd. [Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAAR/APPEAL/2021/32 dated November 2, 2021] modified the ruling passed by the AAR, Gujarat and held that, supply of installation/up-gradation of machines and training services for and on behalf of the Company located outside India, by the supplier in India will not fall under the definition of 'intermediary'.

Citation :
Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAAR/APPEAL/2021/32 dated November 2, 2021

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 245

Comments




CCI Pro