Stayed the demand of penalty and interest in absence of GST Appellate Tribunal


Quick Summary
The Orissa High Court has stayed the demand for penalty and interest by the Revenue Department in a case where the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has not yet been constituted. The court granted the stay on the condition that the assessee deposits the entire tax demanded within 15 days. This allows taxpayers to pursue legal remedies while awaiting the establishment of the GSTAT.

Court :
Orissa High Court

Brief :
The Hon'ble Orissa High Court in Prafulla Kumar Sahoo v. Commissioner of CT & GST Odisha, Banijyakar Bhavan & Ors. [W.P.(C) No. 15842 of 2023 & I.A. No. 7254 of 2023 dated May 17, 2023] had stayed the demand of penalty and interest raised by the Revenue Department, during the pendency of writ petition, subject to the condition that the assessee deposits the entire amount of tax demanded within a period of 15 days, since the assessee wanted to avail the remedy under the provisions of law by approaching GST Appellate Tribunal ("GSTAT").

Citation :
W.P.(C) No. 15842 of 2023 & I.A. No. 7254 of 2023 dated May 17, 2023

The Hon'ble Orissa High Court in Prafulla Kumar Sahoo v. Commissioner of CT & GST Odisha, Banijyakar Bhavan & Ors. [W.P.(C) No. 15842 of 2023 & I.A. No. 7254 of 2023 dated May 17, 2023] had stayed the demand of penalty and interest raised by the Revenue Department, during the pendency of writ petition, subject to the condition that the assessee deposits the entire amount of tax demanded within a period of 15 days, since the assessee wanted to avail the remedy under the provisions of law by approaching GST Appellate Tribunal ("GSTAT").

Facts

This petition has been filed by Prafulla Kumar Sahoo ("the Petitioner") challenging the Order dated April 12, 2023 ("the Impugned Order") passed the by Joint Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal) ("the First Appellate Authority") demanding the amount of penalty and interest, wherein, the appeal preferred by the Petitioner under Section 107(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act") had been rejected.

The Petitioner contended that the Petitioner is not liable to pay the tax and penalty against the Impugned Order as the Petitioner had already deposited 10% of the demanded tax amount before the First Appellate Authority and there is no GSTAT constituted as on date.

Issue

Whether the demand of interest and penalty is liable to be stayed in absence of the GSTAT?

Held

The Hon'ble High Court in W.P.(C) No. 15842 of 2023 held as under:

Issued notice to the Revenue Department.

Noted that, in case the Petitioner wants to avail the remedy by preferring appeal before the GSTAT, the Petitioner would be liable to pay 20% of the disputed tax for consideration of its appeal.

Observed that, the Petitioner wants to avail the remedy under the provisions of law by approaching GSTAT, which has not yet been constituted.
Held that, the amount of penalty and interest demanded shall remain stayed during pendency of the petition, subject to the condition that the Petitioner deposits the entire amount of tax demanded within a period of 15 days.

Relevant provision

Section 112(1) of the CGST Act:

"Appeals to Appellate Tribunal

112. (1) Any person aggrieved by an order passed against him under section 107 or section 108 of this Act or the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act may appeal to the Appellate Tribunal against such order within three months from the date on which the order sought to be appealed against is communicated to the person preferring the appeal."

FAQ :

The Orissa High Court stayed the demand for penalty and interest by the Revenue Department, provided the assessee deposits the entire tax demanded within 15 days.

The demand was stayed because the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), where the assessee intended to appeal, had not yet been constituted.

The assessee must deposit the entire amount of tax demanded within a period of 15 days from the court's order.

Section 112(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, outlines the provisions for appealing to the Appellate Tribunal.

 



Judgement posted by

Service

FCA, FCS LLB with21 Yrs of Experience inTaxation Indirect and Direct: Education Qualification: B.Com (Hons) Chartered Accountants Company Secretary LLB Qualified SAP FI/CO Consultants Professional Membership: Chairmanof Indirect Tax Committee of PHD Chamber of Commerce Member of Indirec ... Read more

Comments




CCI Pro



Company
14 October 2026
GST & TDS ASSISTANT

AGGARWAL SANJAY & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 October 2026
CA ARTICLE

AMKN & CO

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 23 October 2026
CA Articleship / Article Assistant

M N Rao & Associates LLP

Vijayawada

CA Inter

View Details
Company
12 October 2026
Chartered Accountant - Internal Audit

HKC | Chartered Accountants & Business Advisors

Ludhiana

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 November 2026
Article Assisstant

DPV & Associates

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
21 October 2026
CA INTER/ BCOM WITH EXPERIENCE

CA S KUMAR GUPTA & CO

Amritsar

CA Inter

View Details
Company
24 October 2026
CA Industrial Trainee

Fytomax Nutrition Private Limited

Aurangabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 07 November 2026
Paid Assisstant

DPV & Associates

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details