Service Tax to be paid on the income received under business ancillary services

Last updated: 04 October 2023
Quick Summary
The CESTAT, Ahmedabad has ruled that financial hardship is not a valid reason for failing to pay service tax on income received from Business Ancillary Services (BAS). The assessee in this case had received commission income but deliberately failed to disclose it in their monthly returns, despite being aware of the service tax liability. The tribunal upheld the demand for service tax and penalties, dismissing the appeal.

Court :
CESTAT, Ahmedabad

Brief :
The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the case of M/s.Natural Petrochemicals Private Limited vs. C.C.E & S.T, Rajkot [Final Order No. A/12059/2023 dated September 18, 2023] has ruled that the assessee was aware of the chargeability of service tax upon the commission received under the head of Business Ancillary Services ("BAS") and had deliberately never disclosed the same in the monthly returns, thus the financial hardship faced by the assessee is no ground for non-payment of Service Tax, hence dismissed the appeal.  

Citation :
Final Order No. A/12059/2023 dated September 18, 2023

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Typographical Error in the SCN Cannot Be a Shield for the Assessee Who Participated in the Proceedings Without Raising Any Objection
  2. Penalty on partners under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act upheld where complicity in fake invoicing and hawala-linked ITC fraud stands established
  3. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  4. SC : Extended Limitation Cannot Be Invoked Where Department Was Aware of Valuation Facts
  5. SC : Selling Shares While in Possession of UPSI Constitutes Insider Trading Even if No Profit Is Made
  6. SC : Laser Imagers Compatible with Machines Under Different Tariff Headings Classifiable Under CTH 9033
  7. Education Consultancy Services to Foreign Universities Not Intermediary Services; Refund of IGST on Export of Services Allowed
  8. Penalty Cannot Be Confirmed Beyond What is Specified in Statutory Form GST DRC-01
  9. Non-Supply of Field Visit Report Vitiates Rejection of Revocation Application
  10. Alternative Remedy before GSTAT to be Exhausted Despite Allegation that Adjudication Travelled Beyond SCN

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member John Ravindran MosesJohn Ravindran MosesPro Member Pavithra DossPavithra DossPro Member Pratap Kumar DePratap Kumar DePro Member N N V SatishN N V SatishPro Member Rishi MalhotraRishi Malhotra
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category