SC: Deposit of cheque with full amount even not mentioning part payment is not offence u/s 138

Last updated: 12 October 2022
Quick Summary
The Supreme Court has ruled that presenting a cheque for its full amount without endorsing any part payments made by the borrower does not constitute an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that if a portion of the debt has already been settled, the cheque no longer represents the legally enforceable debt at the time of encashment. Therefore, a statutory notice demanding the full amount, without acknowledging the part payment, is invalid.

Court :
Supreme Court of India

Brief :
No Offence for dishonor of cheque under provisions of Section 138 of the NI Act, 1881 is made out if the cheque is presented for full amount without endorsing the part payment made by the borrower after issuance of the cheque.

Citation :
Criminal Appeal No. 1497 of 2022; October 11, 2022

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)

View all CCI PRO benefits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 011-411-70713

 
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. CESTAT: Service Tax Demand Based Solely on ITR Data Unsustainable; 40% Valuation Applicable to Original Works Contract
  2. CESTAT: Renting Vehicles on Per-Trip Basis Not Taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods
  3. CESTAT Denies Refund of Ocean Freight Service Tax Claim Filed Beyond Limitation
  4. CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Merely on Form 26AS; Renting of Residential Hostel Held Non-Taxable
  5. CESTAT: Rajasthan Sales Tax Subsidy under RIPS 2010 Not includible in Excise Assessable Value
  6. CESTAT: Late Payment Charges in the Nature of Interest Not Taxable as Declared Service
  7. CESTAT: Educational Services Exempt Under Section 66D; Extended Period Cannot Be Invoked Without Wilful Suppression
  8. CESTAT: No Service Tax on Royalty under RCM if Mining Lease Was Executed Before 1 April 2016
  9. No pre-deposit required for filing appeal before the GSTAT against penalty-only orders where proceedings commenced prior to October 01 2025
  10. Refund cannot be withheld under Section 54(11) of the CGST Act merely because the Revenue contemplates filing an appeal

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member eddanapudi muralieddanapudi muraliPro Member Manish JadhavManish JadhavPro Member seshacharyseshacharyPro Member ravi_laksravi_laksPro Member Vishal SharmaVishal Sharma
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
22 September 2026
Account Assistant

Chirag P Shah & Co. Chartered Accountant

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 21 September 2026
CA Article Assistant

KK & Company Chartered Accountant

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
30 September 2026
Senior Accountant

Codeboard Technology

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
26 September 2026
Chartered Accountant

pushpganga ventures

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
15 September 2026
Client-site CA associate

Aditya Muley and Co

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 September 2026
Accounts Executive

Hema Yashwanth & Associates

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 September 2026
Junior Accountant

J S P M & Associates LLP

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
30 September 2026
Senior Accounts Executive

Codeboard Technology

Chennai

MBA

View Details