Sandhya Agrawal, New Delhi Vs ITO WARD - 58(3), New Delhi

Author
View profile
Last updated: 16 December 2020
Quick Summary
This case involves an appeal filed by Sandhya Agrawal against an order from ITO Ward 58(3), New Delhi, for the assessment year 2014-15. Ms. Agrawal has requested to withdraw her appeal. This decision was made because she has chosen to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2014-15 is directedagainst the order of learned CIT(A)-35, Delhi dated 24th December, 2019.

Citation :
ITA No.629/Del/2020

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)

BEST VALUE
3 Years PLAN
4999
(Excl. of GST ₹899)

View all CCI PRO benefits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 07941056694

 
downloaded 302 times


Guest

Judgement posted by

Guest

View Judgements
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. No Fresh Pre-Deposit for GSTAT Appeal When Earlier Deposit Already Covers 20% of Disputed Tax
  2. CESTAT: Service Tax Demand Based Solely on ITR Data Unsustainable; 40% Valuation Applicable to Original Works Contract
  3. CESTAT: Renting Vehicles on Per-Trip Basis Not Taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods
  4. CESTAT Denies Refund of Ocean Freight Service Tax Claim Filed Beyond Limitation
  5. CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Merely on Form 26AS; Renting of Residential Hostel Held Non-Taxable
  6. CESTAT: Rajasthan Sales Tax Subsidy under RIPS 2010 Not includible in Excise Assessable Value
  7. CESTAT: Late Payment Charges in the Nature of Interest Not Taxable as Declared Service
  8. CESTAT: Educational Services Exempt Under Section 66D; Extended Period Cannot Be Invoked Without Wilful Suppression
  9. CESTAT: No Service Tax on Royalty under RCM if Mining Lease Was Executed Before 1 April 2016
  10. No pre-deposit required for filing appeal before the GSTAT against penalty-only orders where proceedings commenced prior to October 01 2025

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member shashishashiPro Member B L BhojwaniB L BhojwaniPro Member DHANASHRI KARMARKAR DHANASHRI KARMARKAR Pro Member CA. K. BRAHMANAYAGAMCA. K. BRAHMANAYAGAMPro Member CA Varun GuptaCA Varun Gupta
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
12 November 2026
Tax Product Specialist

BharatX.ai

Gurgaon

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 November 2026
Article Assistant

Jitendra Agarwal & Associates

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
31 October 2026
Accountants

sankaran and krishnan

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
30 October 2026
Asst Manager Accounts

Goodwin Pumps India Pvt Ltd

Chengalpattu

CA Inter

View Details
Company
24 October 2026
CA Industrial Trainee

Fytomax Nutrition Private Limited

Aurangabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 November 2026
Article Assisstant

DPV & Associates

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
23 October 2026
Sr. Accountant

SANKARAN & KRISHNAN

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
19 October 2026
Accountant

Jari Saree Center

New Delhi

Others

View Details