CA Loan Bajaj Finserv
CA Final Online Classes
CA Classes

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Sadalga Urban Souharda Sahakari Bank Niyamit, Belgaum Vs Director Of Income Tax (Intelligence & Criminal Investigation), Bangalore

LinkedIn


Court :
ITAT Bangalore

Brief :
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 17.05.2018. The relevant assessment year is 2013-2014.

Citation :
ITA No.1645/Bang/2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE BENCHES “A”, BANGALORE

Before Shri George George K, JM & Shri B.R.Baskaran, AM

ITA No.1645/Bang/2019 : Asst.Year 2013-2014

M/s.Sadalga Urban Souharda Sahakari Bank Niyamit 1577, M.G.Road, Sadalga,Belgaum – 591 239.PAN : AAAAS1219C.
(Appellant) 
vs.
The Director of Income Tax (Intelligence & Criminal Inv.) Bangalore.
(Respondent)

Appellant by : Sri.C.Sandeep, CA
Respondent by : Sri.S.Sunder Rajan, JCIT-DR

Date of Hearing : 22.10.2020
Date of Pronouncement : 22.10.2020

O R D E R

Per George George K, JM :

This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 17.05.2018. The relevant assessment year is 2013-2014.

2. The assessee has filed a letter dated 21.10.2020, wherein it is stated that the assessee is opting for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and is in process of filing the application. Hence, it was prayed that the Tribunal may be pleased to grant short adjournment.

3. The learned Departmental Representative was duly heard.

4. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. In similar kind of cases, the Tribunal have dismissed appeal as withdrawn with a liberty to the assessee to file an application for recalling the order, if Form No.1 and 2 filed by the assessee is not accepted by the Department, for any reason. When this was suggested to the learned AR, the learned AR prayed that the assessee may be given an opportunity to file an application for recalling this order, if for some reason Form No.1 and 2 filed by the assessee is not accepted by the Department. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The assessee is given the liberty to move appropriate application for recalling the present order in accordance with law, if the assessee intends to do so.

5. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed,as withdrawn.

Order pronounced on this 22nd day of October, 2020.

Sd/-                                                               Sd/-
(B.R.Baskaran)                                             (George George K)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                            JUDICIAL MEMBER

Bangalore; Dated : 22nd October, 2020.
Devadas G*

Copy to :
1. The Appellant.
2. The Respondent.
3. The CIT(A)-10, Bengaluru.
4. The Pr.CIT-, Belgaum.
5. The DR, ITAT, Bengaluru.
6. Guard File.

Asst.Registrar/ITAT, Bangalore
 

 

Guest
on 29 October 2020
Published in Income Tax
Views : 5
Report Abuse

LinkedIn







Trending Tags