CA Loan Bajaj Finserv
CA Final Online Classes
CA Classes

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Sachin Kumar, New Delhi Vs ITO, Ward-70(3), New Delhi

LinkedIn


Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2015-16 isdirected against the order of learned CIT(A)-28, New Delhi dated 30th December, 2019.

Citation :
ITA No.734/Del/2020

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH ‘A’ : NEW DELHI
(Through Video Conferencing)

BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND
SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA No.734/Del/2020
Assessment Year : 2015-16

Shri Sachin Kumar,
AG-407, Shalimar Bagh,
Delhi – 110 088.
PAN : AWDPK5737B.
(Appellant) 

Vs. 

Income Tax Officer,
Ward-70(3),
New Delhi.
(Respondent)

Appellant by : None.
Respondent by : Shri Shriprakash Dubey, Senior DR.

Date of hearing : 10.12.2020
Date of pronouncement : 10.12.2020

ORDER

PER G.S. PANNU, VP :

This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2015-16 isdirected against the order of learned CIT(A)-28, New Delhi dated 30th December, 2019.

2. Nobody appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of Virtual Hearing before us. The learned counsel for the assessee, vide email dated 7th December, 2020 has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settlethe dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year underconsideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

To know more in details find the attachment file

 

Guest
on 16 December 2020
Published in Income Tax
Views : 10
downloaded 3 times
Report Abuse

LinkedIn







Trending Tags