Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959

Last updated: 09 April 2008

Save Share

Court :
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Brief :

Citation :
Southern Continental Contractors Ltd., In re S. ANANDA REDDY, J COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 1572 OF 2007 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 682 OF 2002 COMPANY PETITION NO. 144 OF 2001

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Southern Continental Contractors Ltd., In re S. ANANDA REDDY, J COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 1572 OF 2007 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 682 OF 2002 COMPANY PETITION NO. 144 OF 2001 September 27, 2007 Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Inherent power of Court - Application was filed by Advocate Commissioner seeking permission of High Court to consider claim applications of 19 depositors, who prepared Form-66 in time but submitted belatedly and consequently to effect payments - It was stated that depositors had furnished Form-66 on non-judicial stamp paper was purchased within time but there was some delay in furnishing of same - Whether since claims related to small amounts in most of cases, except three cases where claims were for Rs.50,000, Rs,20,000 and Rs.10,000, permission could be granted for considering claim applications without insisting depositors to approach High Court to condone delay by each of depositors - Held, yes

110 Views Comment Share Corporate Law Report

Judgement posted by

C.rajesh

Articles

I am hard working nature but a little short tempted. Cool and soft but not too much smily. Good but not so good. Helping nature but only to the needy. Friendly minded but not talktive. I am CA finalist. completed CA attempt...........but waiting for the result.....Thanks for visting my profile

View Judgements

Comments