Provisional attachment of bank account is to be lifted up after one year


Quick Summary
The Bombay High Court has ruled that a provisional attachment order for a bank account is no longer valid after one year. In this case, the attachment order was issued in April 2022 and was set to expire one year later. The court found that the revenue department failed to demonstrate that a valid order was served or that a new order was issued before the original attachment lapsed.

Court :
Bombay High Court

Brief :
The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Bharat Parihar v. State of Maharashtra Thr. PP Office and Ors. [Writ Petition No. 3742 of 2023 dated June 30, 2023] set aside the provisional attachment order and held that the provisional attachment order is not valid after one year.

Citation :
Writ Petition No. 3742 of 2023 dated June 30, 2023

The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Bharat Parihar v. State of Maharashtra Thr. PP Office and Ors. [Writ Petition No. 3742 of 2023 dated June 30, 2023] set aside the provisional attachment order and held that the provisional attachment order is not valid after one year.

Facts

Bharat Parihar ("the Petitioner") had abank account with the Yes bank which was provisionally attached on April 21,2022 by the Revenue department ("the Respondent") and was communicated to the Petitioner on April 19, 2023 also retained under Section 83 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act").  The Petitioner filed the writ petition as his objections to provisional attachment of the bank account were disposed off under Rule 159(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 ("the CGST Rules").

The Respondent contended that the order under Rule 159(5) of the CGST Rules disposing off  the objections attaching the bank account provisionally is an appealable order and therefore, the writ petition should not being entertained and also relied on Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act") in support of the contention that the same is an appealable order.

The Petitioner contended that the provisional attachment could not have effect after the expiry of a period of "one year" from the date of the order as per Section 83(2) of the CGST Act.

The Petitioner relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Radha Krishan Industries vs. State of Himachal Pradesh[Civil Appeal No 1155 of 2021 dated April 20, 2021]wherein it was held that the order disposing the objections to provisional attachment of bank account is not an appealable order, the only remedy available is the invocation of the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Issue

Whether the provisional attachment of bank account is to be lifted up after one year?

Held

The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No.3742 of 2023 held as under:

  • Observed that, the Respondent has failed to show that the order was passed and served on the Petitioner, much less prior to the provisional attachment order ceased to operate by virtue of Section 83(2) of the CGST Act and the communication dated April 19, 2023, furthermore no fresh order had been passed by the Respondent to attach the Petitioner's bank account on April 19, 2023.
  • Opined that, the noting in the file of the Respondent could not constitute an order without a formal order, as the law may mandate, being passed and being communicated to the affected person, whose bank account was attached.
  • Held that, the communication dated April 21, 2022, for provisionally attaching the bank account of the Petitioner was illegal and invalid  as per Section 83(2) of the CGST Act.

Relevant Provisions

Section 83 of the CGST Act

"Provisional attachment to protect revenue in certain cases

83. (1) Where, after the initiation of any proceeding under Chapter XII, Chapter XIV or Chapter XV, the Commissioner is of the opinion that for the purpose of protecting the interest of the Government revenue it is necessary so to do, he may, by order in writing, attach provisionally, any property, including bank account, belonging to the taxable person or any person specified in sub-section (1A) of section 122, in such manner as may be prescribed.

(2) Every such provisional attachment shall cease to have effect after the expiry of a period of one year from the date of the order made under sub-section (1)."

Rule 159(5) of the CGST Rules

"Provisional attachment of property

Any person whose property is attached may file an objection in FORM GST DRC-22A to the effect that the property attached was or is not liable to attachment, and the Commissioner may, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the person filing the objection, release the said property by an order in FORM GST DRC- 23."

Our comments

Provisional Attachment of Property/ Bank Account

Section 83(1) of the CGST Act that deals with provisional attachment of any property to protect revenue, has been amended in a manner, to widen the scope of the power to provisionally attach any property by replacing specified Sections covered therein with complete Chapters of the CGST Act. Also, it is provided that provisional attachment shall remain valid for the entire period starting from the initiation of any proceeding under Chapter XII (assessment), Chapter XIV (inspection, search, seizure and arrest) or Chapter XV (Demands and Recovery) till the expiry of a period of one year from the date of order made thereunder.

In addition, the Commissioner is now empowered to provisionally attach, property belonging to any persons who retain the benefits arising out of an offence or at whose instance the offence is committed.

However, in all cases, the provisional attachment shall cease to have effect after the expiry of a period of one year from the date of the said order.

FAQ :

A provisional attachment is an order issued by the Commissioner to temporarily seize a bank account to protect government revenue during ongoing proceedings under the CGST Act.

According to Section 83(2) of the CGST Act, every provisional attachment ceases to have effect after the expiry of one year from the date of the order.

The Bombay High Court lifted the provisional attachment of Bharat Parihar's bank account, stating it was invalid as it had expired after one year without a valid extension or new order.

The law, as interpreted by the Bombay High Court in this instance, states that the attachment ceases to have effect after one year unless a new, formal order is issued and communicated.

You can file an objection in FORM GST DRC-22A. The Commissioner must provide an opportunity for a hearing before deciding whether to release the attached property.

 



Judgement posted by

Service

FCA, FCS LLB with21 Yrs of Experience inTaxation Indirect and Direct: Education Qualification: B.Com (Hons) Chartered Accountants Company Secretary LLB Qualified SAP FI/CO Consultants Professional Membership: Chairmanof Indirect Tax Committee of PHD Chamber of Commerce Member of Indirec ... Read more

Comments




CCI Pro



Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 October 2026
CA ARTICLE

AMKN & CO

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
12 October 2026
Finance

I-Genext Consulting Private Limited

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
06 October 2026
Assistant Manager - Audit and Compliance

Ravi K Jain & Co

Noida

Others

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Assistant

Malhotra Rajesh & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
13 October 2026
Accountant

Zerdi & Co. Chartered Accountants

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 October 2026
ARTICLE TRAINEE

S.B.G. & CO. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
15 October 2026
Senior Accountant

Continental Belting Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
26 September 2026
Chartered Accountant

pushpganga ventures

Pune

CA

View Details