banner_ad

Providing an Opportunity for a Personal Hearing is mandatory before issuing of Order


Last updated: 23 January 2024

Court :
Madras High Court

Brief :
The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of the A.H. Enterprises v. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer [Writ Petition No. 35894 of 2023 dated January 04, 2024] held that it is mandatory to provide the personal hearing under Section 75 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 ("the TNGST Act") before passing an Order.  

Citation :
Writ Petition No. 35894 of 2023 dated January 04, 2024

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of the A.H. Enterprises v. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer [Writ Petition No. 35894 of 2023 dated January 04, 2024] held that it is mandatory to provide the personal hearing under Section 75 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 ("the TNGST Act") before passing an Order.  

Facts

A.H. Enterprises ("the Petitioner") was called upon to pay a sum of INR 2,58,597/- towards the difference between returns filed in FORM GSTR 1 and FORM GSTR 3B including both interest and penalty vide Order dated October 11, 2023("Impugned Order"). 

The Petitioner contended that the Impugned Order was issued without providing an opportunity of a personal hearing as mandated by Section 75 of the TNGST Act.  

The Depuy Commercial Tax Officer ("the Respondent") contended that the demand raised in the Impugned Order is the difference between the returns filed in FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR 3B along with interest and penalty and the matter may be remanded for reconsideration.

Hence, the petition was filed by the Petitioner to challenge the Impugned Notice. 

Issue

Whether it is mandatory to provide an opportunity forthe personal hearing before the issuance of an Order by the Authority?

Held

The Madras High Court in Writ Petition No. 35894 of 2023 held as under:

  • Held that, as per Section 75 of the TNGST Act, it is mandatoryto provide the Personal Hearing to the Petition before the issuance of the Impugned Order. 
  • Directed that, the Respondent provide a Personal Hearing to the Petitioner and thereafter issue a reasoned order within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Hence, the Impugned Order was quashed and remanded for reconsideration.
     
 

CCI Pro

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 164

Comments




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news


Company
16 May 2026
Account & Audit Asst

RAHUL KHANDEBHARAD & ASSOCIATES

Nashik

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 May 2026
SEMI QUALIFIED/ CA DROPOUTS/ ARTICLES

T R SOOD & CO

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 May 2026
CA ARTICLE

PRAVEEN GARG & CO

Faridabad

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
07 June 2026
Tax Associate

Rajkumar Jain & Co.

Ahmedabad

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 09 June 2026
Article Trainee

Numbertree LLP

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 23 May 2026
Article Assistants

Acupro Consulting

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
29 May 2026
Finance Head

Bhawar Sales Corporation

Chennai

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
14 May 2026
ICSI Trainees for 21 Months and Semi-Qualified CS

CMNITY HIRE

New Delhi

Others

View Details