Providing an Opportunity for a Personal Hearing is mandatory before issuing of Order


Last updated: 23 January 2024

Court :
Madras High Court

Brief :
The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of the A.H. Enterprises v. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer [Writ Petition No. 35894 of 2023 dated January 04, 2024] held that it is mandatory to provide the personal hearing under Section 75 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 ("the TNGST Act") before passing an Order.  

Citation :
Writ Petition No. 35894 of 2023 dated January 04, 2024

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of the A.H. Enterprises v. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer [Writ Petition No. 35894 of 2023 dated January 04, 2024] held that it is mandatory to provide the personal hearing under Section 75 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 ("the TNGST Act") before passing an Order.  

Facts

A.H. Enterprises ("the Petitioner") was called upon to pay a sum of INR 2,58,597/- towards the difference between returns filed in FORM GSTR 1 and FORM GSTR 3B including both interest and penalty vide Order dated October 11, 2023("Impugned Order"). 

The Petitioner contended that the Impugned Order was issued without providing an opportunity of a personal hearing as mandated by Section 75 of the TNGST Act.  

The Depuy Commercial Tax Officer ("the Respondent") contended that the demand raised in the Impugned Order is the difference between the returns filed in FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR 3B along with interest and penalty and the matter may be remanded for reconsideration.

Hence, the petition was filed by the Petitioner to challenge the Impugned Notice. 

Issue

Whether it is mandatory to provide an opportunity forthe personal hearing before the issuance of an Order by the Authority?

Held

The Madras High Court in Writ Petition No. 35894 of 2023 held as under:

  • Held that, as per Section 75 of the TNGST Act, it is mandatoryto provide the Personal Hearing to the Petition before the issuance of the Impugned Order. 
  • Directed that, the Respondent provide a Personal Hearing to the Petitioner and thereafter issue a reasoned order within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Hence, the Impugned Order was quashed and remanded for reconsideration.
     
 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 167

Comments




CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 June 2026
CA Articled Trainee And Paid Assistant

SKAA & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
20 June 2026
Assistant Accounts Manager

Fintax Professionals

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 June 2026
Article Assistant

Sharma Chetan And Company

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
12 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Winshine Financial Services

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 June 2026
Article Assistance

RB KESHRI & CO.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Senior Account (VA Client Operations)

Karbon Business

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
AUDIT MANAGER

JDAS & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

CA

View Details