Principal Additional Director DGGI empowered to pass order for provisional attachment of Bank Account under Section 83


Quick Summary
The Delhi High Court has ruled that the Principal Additional Director General of DGGI is indeed empowered to order the provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83 of the CGST Act. This decision arose from a case where a petitioner challenged such an order, arguing it was made without proper jurisdiction. The court clarified that specific notifications empower officers like the Principal Additional Director General to exercise these powers, while also directing that the petitioner's objections be addressed promptly.

Court :
Delhi High Court

Brief :
The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Nikhil Gupta v. Principal Additional Director General DGGI Gurugram Zonal Unit [W.P. (C) No. 10651 of 2024 dated August 02, 2024] held that the Principal Additional Director, DGGI is empowered to pass the order of provisional attachment of bank account under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act").

Citation :
W.P. (C) No. 10651 of 2024 dated August 02, 2024

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Nikhil Gupta v. Principal Additional Director General DGGI Gurugram Zonal Unit [W.P. (C) No. 10651 of 2024 dated August 02, 2024] held that the Principal Additional Director, DGGI is empowered to pass the order of provisional attachment of bank account under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act").

Facts:

Nikhil Gupta ("the Petitioner") filed a writ petition challenging the order passed under Section 83 of the CGST Act in Form GST DRC-22 ("the Impugned Order") wherein the bank account maintained by the Petitioner was directed to be provisionally attached. Also, the Petitioner is aggrieved by the blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger ("ECL").

The Petitioner against the Impugned Order has filed objection under Rule 159(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules but the said reply has not been taken into consideration and no order has been passed pursuant to such objection.

The Petitioner contended that only the Commissioner is empowered to pass the order under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act and in the present case, the Impugned Order was not passed by the Commissioner and the said order has been passed without jurisdiction. Also, it was contended that the said order has been passed without any reason to believe that such order is necessary to protect the interest of the Government Revenue.

Issue:

Whether Principal Additional Director of DGGI is empowered to pass order for provisional attachment of Bank Account under Section 83 of the CGST Act?

Held:

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in W.P (C) No. 10651 of 2024held as under:

  • Observed that, as per Section 83(1) of the CGST Act, only the Commissioner is empowered to pass the order of provisional attachment under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act.
  • Further observed that, Section 3(d) of the CGST Act specifically mentions the Commissioner of Central Tax or Additional Director General of Central Tax as the specified classes of officers for the purpose of CGST Act.
  • Noted that, the Notification No. 14/2017-Central Tax dated July 1, 2017 specifically empowers the Principal Director General, Goods and Services Tax Intelligence or Principal Director General, Goods and Services Tax to exercise power of the Principal Chief Commissioner.
  • Opined that, the contentions made by the Petitioner are not maintainable as the Impugned Order has been passed by the Principal Additional Director General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence.
  • Directed that, the Commissioner should decide the Petitioner objections filed against the Impugned Order expeditiously.

Relevant Provision:

Section 83 of the CGST Act

"Section 83: Provisional attachment to protect revenue in certain cases

(1) Where, after the initiation of any proceeding under Chapter XII, Chapter XIV or Chapter XV, the Commissioner is of the opinion that for the purpose of protecting the interest of the Government revenue it is necessary so to do, he may, by order in writing, attach provisionally, any property, including bank account, belonging to the taxable person or any person specified in sub-section (1A) of section 122, in such manner as may be prescribed.

(2) Every such provisional attachment shall cease to have effect after the expiry of a period of one year from the date of the order made under sub-section (1)"

Notification No. 14/2017-Central Tax dated July 1, 2017

"G.S.R 818 (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred under section 3 read with section 5 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) and section 3 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (13 of 2017), 1[the Government] hereby appoints the officers in the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax and Directorate General of Audit as specified in column (2) of the Table below, as central tax officers and invests them with all the powers under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the rules made there under, throughout the territory of India"

OFFICIAL JUDGMENT COPY HAS BEEN ATTACHED

FAQ :

Yes, the Delhi High Court has confirmed that the Principal Additional Director General of DGGI is empowered to pass an order for the provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83 of the CGST Act.

Section 83 of the CGST Act allows the Commissioner to provisionally attach any property, including a bank account, belonging to a taxable person if they believe it is necessary to protect government revenue during certain proceedings.

The petitioner was challenging an order for the provisional attachment of their bank account and the blocking of their Electronic Credit Ledger, arguing that the order was passed without proper jurisdiction by an officer not authorised under Section 83.

No, the High Court disagreed. It noted that specific notifications empower officers like the Principal Additional Director General of DGGI to exercise the powers under Section 83, thus rejecting the petitioner's contention of lack of jurisdiction.

The court directed the Commissioner to decide the petitioner's objections filed against the provisional attachment order expeditiously.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 120
downloaded 225 times

Comments




CCI Pro



Company
28 August 2026
Audit Manager

K A R M & CO

Mumbai

CMA

View Details
Company
17 August 2026
Chartered Accountant with US GAAP Experience

Austin Med Solutions Pvt Ltd

Bengaluru

CA

View Details
Company
04 September 2026
CA inter Or ca finalist

A Jaiswal and company

Lucknow

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 September 2026
CA Articles

Kothari Jain Patil & Chartered Accountants

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 September 2026
Accounts Executive

Hema Yashwanth & Associates

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 26 August 2026
Article Assistant

ANIVESH CONSULTANTS LLP

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
18 August 2026
CA Semi Qualifies

Goyanka and Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
21 August 2026
Finance Manager

Resollect Technologies Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

CA

View Details