CA Loan Bajaj Finserv
CA Final Online Classes
CA Classes

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Liability for dishonour of cheque

LinkedIn


Court :
Supreme Court

Brief :
Liability for dishonour of cheque

Citation :
S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Neeta Bhalla Vs. Neeta Bhalla 9/20/2005 (2005) 148 Taxman 128 (SC)

Liability for dishonour of cheque S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Neeta Bhalla Vs. Neeta Bhalla 9/20/2005 (2005) 148 Taxman 128 (SC) Case Fact: Whether it is necessary to show that the person accused was incharge of and responsible for conduct of business of the company at the time the offence was committed to held him liable u/s 141. Decision: Held by Ho"ble court that liability u/s 141 is attracted if the person accused was incharge of and responsible for conduct of the company at the time of the offence. Hence the above mentioned fact has to be established before applying section 141.
 

CA. Vineet Grover
on 23 May 2008
Published in Others
Views :
Report Abuse

LinkedIn







Trending Tags
X

Do you have any Tax Queries

Submit