Court :
Delhi High Court
Brief :
The petitioner - Linde had formed a consortium with Samsung through MOU for jointly submitting a bid to secure a tender floated by OPAL to execute a project on turnkey basis. The proposal was accepted by OPAL. The consortium entered into an agreement with OPAL for carrying out work in accordance with the bid. Linde filed an application before the Assessing Officer under section 197 of the Actclaiming that no portion of the amount payable to Linde was liable to be subjected to withholding of tax under section 195 of the Act and that the amounts received/receivable by Linde for the said supplies and services were not chargeable to tax in India.The principal controversy which is required to be considered in the present petition is: whether in the given facts, Linde and Samsung constitute an Association of Persons within the meaning of ‘person’ as defined under section 2(31) of the Act? And, whether the income received/receivable by Linde for the supply of equipment, material and spares outside India and for rendering services outside India is taxable in India?
Citation :
Linde AG, LindeEngineering Division and ANR – Petitioners – versus - Deputy Directorof Income Tax- Respondent
Browse CAclubindia ads free.
Latest updates on WA.
Daily E-Newsletter and much more.
CCI PRO annual subscription :
Duration : 1 year
(Prices Inclusive of GST)
Input Tax Credit, GST refunds and Recovery of refunds- Roadblocks and way outs
GST LIVE Certification Course - 43rd Weekdays Batch(With Govt Certificate)