Avail 20% discount on updated CA lectures for Dec 21 .Use Code RESULT20 !! Call : 088803-20003

ICICI

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

laconic and non-speaking order of learned CIT(A) is not sustainable - ITAT allows appeal for statistical purpose

LinkedIn


Court :
ITAT Mumbai

Brief :
This is an appeal by the assessee against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short learned CIT(A)] dated 10.3.2015 pertaining assessment year 2007-08 wherein learned CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal without any discussion on merits by simply noting the grounds and observing as under :-

Citation :
I.T.A. No. 4554/Mum/2017

THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“SMC” Bench, Mumbai
Shri Shamim Yahya (AM)

I.T.A. No. 4554/Mum/2017 
(Assessment Year 2007-08)

Shri Devendra C. Vibhakar
101-B, Ramjas CHSL
Devidas Lane, Borival i-W
Mumbai-400 103.
PAN : AAAPV5079J
(Appellant) 

Vs.

ITO -25(1) (1)
Mumbai
(Respondent)

Assessee by Shri Paresh Gohil
Department by Ms. Smita Verma

Date of Hearing 16.12.2020
Date of Pronouncement 1.1.2021

O R D E R

This is an appeal by the assessee against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short learned CIT(A)] dated 10.3.2015 pertaining assessment year 2007-08 wherein learned CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal without any discussion on merits by simply noting the grounds and observing as under :-

“The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) on 30.11.2009 at a total income of Rs.11,73,710/- as against the returned income of Rs.1,73,710/-. Thereafter, the case was selected for scrutiny u/s 148 of the I.T. Act afterrecording the reasons for re-opening of assessment. Notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 4.9.2012 and 4.1.2013.

The AO raised the issue regarding unproved liability, unexplained cash creditu/s 68 and unexplained investment. Explanation offered of the assessee hasnot been accepted by the AO and the addition was made against which the assessee is in appeal.

After having filed the appeal, however, despite fixing the case for hearing on 4 different occasions, no credible argument/ explanation has been provided bythe assessee to substantiate the claim in respect of grounds of appeal and therefore, the issue cannot be taken up on merit. In the light of the above facts, the appeal is dismissed.”

To know more in details find the attachment file
 

 

Guest
on 22 January 2021
Published in Income Tax
Views : 22
downloaded 8 times
Report Abuse

LinkedIn







Trending Tags