Kamal Kapoor (HUF), New Delhi ITO WARD - 36(1), New Delhi

Author
View profile
Last updated: 12 March 2021
Quick Summary
This Income Tax Appellate Tribunal case concerns an appeal filed by Kamal Kapoor (HUF) against an order from the CIT(A)-37 for the Assessment Year 2008-09. The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal because the dispute had been resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Consequently, the tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
 This appeal filed by the assessee is preferred against theorder of the CIT(A)-37, New Delhi dated 27.05.2019 forA.Y. 2008-09.

Citation :
ITA No.6997/Del/2019

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)

View all CCI PRO benefits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 011-411-70713

 


Guest

Judgement posted by

Guest

View Judgements
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. CESTAT: Service Tax Demand Based Solely on ITR Data Unsustainable; 40% Valuation Applicable to Original Works Contract
  2. CESTAT: Renting Vehicles on Per-Trip Basis Not Taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods
  3. CESTAT Denies Refund of Ocean Freight Service Tax Claim Filed Beyond Limitation
  4. CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Merely on Form 26AS; Renting of Residential Hostel Held Non-Taxable
  5. CESTAT: Rajasthan Sales Tax Subsidy under RIPS 2010 Not includible in Excise Assessable Value
  6. CESTAT: Late Payment Charges in the Nature of Interest Not Taxable as Declared Service
  7. CESTAT: Educational Services Exempt Under Section 66D; Extended Period Cannot Be Invoked Without Wilful Suppression
  8. CESTAT: No Service Tax on Royalty under RCM if Mining Lease Was Executed Before 1 April 2016
  9. No pre-deposit required for filing appeal before the GSTAT against penalty-only orders where proceedings commenced prior to October 01 2025
  10. Refund cannot be withheld under Section 54(11) of the CGST Act merely because the Revenue contemplates filing an appeal

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member Ravinder paruthiRavinder paruthiPro Member AshishAshishPro Member sumitsumitPro Member CA Rahul PatwardhanCA Rahul PatwardhanPro Member Vishal SharmaVishal Sharma
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
05 October 2026
Senior Accountant

Vision IT Peripherals Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
12 October 2026
Chartered Accountant - Internal Audit

HKC | Chartered Accountants & Business Advisors

Ludhiana

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 October 2026
ARTICLE TRAINEE

S.B.G. & CO. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 September 2026
Junior Accountant

J S P M & Associates LLP

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
12 October 2026
AUDIT , ACCOUNTS AND TAXATION

KDSS

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
08 October 2026
Account Executive

Elite Taxation

New Delhi

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
08 October 2026
Accounts and Tax Associate

POOJA R TELI & CO

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 September 2026
Article Assistant

MANUJ SHARMA AND COMPANY

Noida

CA Inter

View Details