Is a service procured from Beacon US in respect of the referral of the FIS client liable to tax under the IGST Act?

Last updated: 27 November 2021
Quick Summary
This advance ruling addresses whether services provided by Beacon US, concerning the referral of FIS clients, are subject to Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST). The Authority for Advance Rulings in Karnataka examined the specifics of the transaction to determine its tax liability under the IGST Act.

Court :
Centre The Commissioner of Central Taxes, Bangalore East Commissionerate, Bengaluru.

Brief :
Whether the service procured by the applicant from Beacon US in respect of the referral of the FIS client is liable to tax under the IGST Act, 2017 and consequently whether the said service qualifies as an import of service under Section 2(11) of the said enactment? If the answer to the above is yes, who is the person liable to tax in respect of the said services rendered by Beacon US to applicant?

Citation :
KAR ADRG 52/2021

THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS IN KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA, KALIDASA ROAD GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009 
Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 52/2021 Dated : 29-10-2021 
Present: 
1. Dr.M.P. Ravi Prasad Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes . . . . Member (State) 
2. Sri. T. Kiran Reddy Joint Commissioner of Customs & Indirect Taxes . . . .Member (Central) 

Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement.

FAQ :

The ruling determines if services procured from Beacon US for referring FIS clients are liable to tax under the IGST Act.

The Authority for Advance Rulings in Karnataka issued this ruling.

The ruling considers liability under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Act.

The advance ruling was dated 29-10-2021.

 
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Incremental GST burden on pre-GST works contracts is recoverable only from the contracting employer and not from the State or tax authorities
  2. Time Spent in Pursuing Rectification Application under Section 161 of the CGST Act Excludible While Computing Limitation for Filing Appeal under Section 107
  3. Cancellation of GST registration based on defective verification reports fails the statutory test of 'reasons to believe’
  4. Limitation for filing GST appeal runs from the date of actual communication of the order as declared by the dealer unless rebutted by the Revenue through cogent material
  5. Supreme Court: Cruise Operators Eligible for Section 44B Presumptive Taxation; Hospitality Services Do Not Change Nature of ‘Carriage’
  6. Karnataka High Court Quashes Externment Order Passed Without Adequate Opportunity of Hearing
  7. Supreme Court: No Service Tax on Indivisible Turnkey ATM Contracts Prior to 1 June 2007
  8. ITAT Quashes AY 2015-16 Reassessment as Section 148 Notice Issued After 1 April 2021 Was Invalid
  9. ITAT Condones 2,073-Day Delay and Deletes Addition for Cash Deposit Explained by Property Sale and Savings
  10. ITAT Deletes Addition for Alleged On-Money Payment Due to Lack of Evidence Against Buyer

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member prasanth konaprasanth konaPro Member N SelvarajN SelvarajPro Member Ankur Kumar TiwariAnkur Kumar TiwariPro Member NILESH CHAVDANILESH CHAVDAPro Member Ashif CheenikkalAshif Cheenikkal
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category