In the matter of Mr. Pinaki Sircar, Insolvency Professional

Last updated: 05 December 2020
Quick Summary
This order concerns Mr. Pinaki Sircar, an Insolvency Professional (IP), and a Show Cause Notice issued by the IBBI. The notice alleged that Mr. Sircar accepted an assignment as Liquidator for M/s Bansal Refineries Private Limited after 31st December 2019 without a valid Authorisation for Assignment (AFA) from his IPA. Mr. Sircar submitted a reply and was given a personal hearing.

Court :
IBBI

Brief :
This Order disposes of the Show Cause Notice (SCN) No. IBBI/IP/MON/2020/25 dated 28th August, 2020 issued to Mr. Pinaki Sircar, 31/7, N.C. Chowdhury Road, Kolkata, West Bengal700042, who is a Professional Member of the ICSI Institute of Insolvency Professionals (IPA) and an IP registered with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) with Registration No. IBBI/IPA-002/IP-N00063/2017-2018/10141.

Citation :
No. IBBI/DC/49/2020

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Guest
Published in Corporate Law
Views : 349
downloaded 489 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments

Join CAclubindia WhatsApp Finance Community & stay updated with the latest TAX news, compliance alerts and important updates all in one place!

Recent Judgments :

  1. No 10% pre-deposit required on any Penalty-only order from SCN issued prior to October 01, 2025
  2. Ratification is no substitute for recommendation - Notifications travelling beyond GST Council recommendations are ultra vires
  3. Disparity between seigniorage fee paid and supply value declared in GSTR-1 justifies invocation of extended period of limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act
  4. Interest on Delayed Payment of GST Arises by Operation of Law and Cannot be Waived by Courts
  5. Supreme Court to examine whether the six-month time limit for issuance of show cause notice under Section 74(2) of the CGST Act is mandatory or directory
  6. Advocates ought to be summoned only in rare and exceptional circumstances
  7. Unsigned Assessment Order in Form GST DRC-07 is Invalid as Absence of the Assessing Officer's Signature is an Incurable Jurisdictional Defect
  8. SC to examine whether an assessee can be relegated to the appellate remedy, when the challenge is to a binding Circular
  9. Mere Expiry of E-Way Bill Without Intent to Evade Tax Cannot Justify 200% Penalty
  10. No GST Levy on Assignment of Leasehold Rights of Industrial Plots as Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's SLPs

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member Vivekanand SagarVivekanand SagarPro Member VIJAY M DHANAKVIJAY M DHANAKPro Member Senapathy ThangarajSenapathy ThangarajPro Member Amit ChoudharyAmit ChoudharyPro Member AnoopAnoop
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Follow