banner_ad

Disallowance of excess claim of development expenses by AO


Last updated: 11 September 2021

Court :
ITAT Chennai

Brief :
This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the learned CIT(A)-14, Chennai dated 26.03.2018 and pertains to assessment year 2008-09.

Citation :
I .T.A.No.1922/Chny/2018

BEFORE SHRI V.DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND SHRI G.MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

I .T.A.No.1922/Chny/2018

Assessment Year : 2008-09)

The Income Tax Officer,
Non-Corporate Ward-13(4)
Chennai

vs

M/s. Guru Homes,
5, PeriyarSalai,
Thiru Nagar, Ashok Nagar
Chennai-600 083.

PAN: AAHFG 0077A

Appellant by : Ms. Anita, Addl.CIT

Respondent by : Mr.N.R.Krishnamoorthy, FCA

Date of hearing : 25.08.2021

Date of Pronouncement : 01.09.2021

O R D E R

This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the learned CIT(A)-14, Chennai dated 26.03.2018 and pertains to assessment year 2008-09.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee, a partnership firm, is engaged in the business of construction of flats filed its return of income for assessment year 2008-09 on 30.06.2009 declaring total income of Rs.65,847/-. The assessment has been subsequently reopened u/s.147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

3. The first issue that came up for our consideration from ground no. 1 to 2.5 of revenue appeal is deletion of disallowance of excess claim of development expense of Rs.2,78,20,552/-. The learned DR for the Revenue submitted that the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting disallowance of excess claim of development expenses, without appreciating fact that assessee has claimed entire development expenses in the impugned assessment years, even though it has recognized revenue from sale of flats for three assessment years including impugned assessment year.

4. The next issue that came up for our consideration from ground no.3 of revenue appeal is ad-hoc disallowance of various expenses on the ground that said expenses incurred in cash and not further, supported by necessary bills and vouchers. The Assessing Officer has disallowed 20% of contract expenses like site expenses, earth filling charges and sand purchases on the ground that the assessee has incurred expenditure in cash.

5. In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 1st September , 2021

Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement

 

CCI Pro

Poojitha Raam Vinay pro badge
Published in Income Tax
Views : 99
downloaded 238 times

Comments




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Company
Featured 02 May 2026
Senior Executive

hitesh chandwani & co

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 29 April 2026
Manager- Finance and Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details