Demand of borrower is legal and tenable and amount deposited will be returned to borrower


Quick Summary
The Supreme Court has ruled that a borrower's demand for the return of a deposit made during an appeal under the SARFAESI Act is legal and tenable. The borrower had deposited 50% of the claimed amount to appeal an order, but later withdrew the appeal as the underlying debt recovery tribunal case was resolved. The Court determined that the deposited amount, not being a secured asset or subject to bailment, should be returned to the borrower.

Court :
Appellate Tribunal

Brief :
Borrower has appealed Order under SARFASEI ACT before DRAT and has deposited 50% of the contended sum. The appeal was further withdrawn by the borrower and appealed for refund of deposit amount. The Bank contended it cannot be refunded.

Citation :
Civil Appeal No. 4379 of 2016

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Comments




CCI Pro



Follow