Computation of Annual Value u/s 23 of the Income Tax Act

Last updated: 27 November 2021
Quick Summary
This judgement from the High Court of Karnataka concerns the computation of annual value for rental properties under Section 23 of the Income Tax Act. It clarifies the rules and principles applied by tax authorities when determining the taxable income from properties. The case involves M/s Sobha Interiors (P) Ltd and the Income Tax Department.

Court :
High Court of Karnataka

Brief :
Whether the tribunal is justified holding that the annual value to be adapted?

Citation :
ITA 166/2017

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

3 MONTHS PLAN
999
(Excl of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Poojitha Raam Vinay
Published in Income Tax
Views : 113
downloaded 340 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Refund cannot be withheld under Section 54(11) of the CGST Act merely because the Revenue contemplates filing an appeal
  2. Scope of Rectification under Section 161 of the CGST Act is Confined to Errors Apparent on the Face of Record
  3. Appellate Authority has no power to condone delay in filing appeal beyond the outer limit prescribed under Section 107(4) of the CGST Act
  4. CESTAT New Delhi: Sub-Contractor Separately Liable for Service Tax Regardless of Main Contractor's Discharge
  5. Cenvat Credit Cannot Be Denied Merely on Third-Party Statements Without Corroborative Evidence
  6. CESTAT: Service Tax Not Leviable on Unclaimed Amounts Written Off Without Evidence of Taxable Service
  7. Partners of a Partnership Firm are personally liable for GST dues of the Firm and bank account of an erstwhile partner can be attached for recovery
  8. Prima facie satisfaction and not conclusive proof of fraud is sufficient to invoke Section 74 of the CGST Act
  9. Show Cause Notice issued to a non-existent amalgamated company is void ab initio and cannot be saved by Section 87 of the CGST Act
  10. SC Landmark Ruling: Mechanical Invocation of Fraud Cannot Extend Limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member Ankur Kumar TiwariAnkur Kumar TiwariPro Member Nitin ShrotriNitin ShrotriPro Member Verma ManojVerma ManojPro Member shashishashiPro Member P.S.HarishankarP.S.Harishankar
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
11 August 2026
Chartered Accountant

Aviv Global Pvt Ltd

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 06 August 2026
Junior Accounting Associate

Prish Consultancy LLP

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
14 August 2026
Article Assistant CA Articleship

Eshwar & Co Chartered Accountants - Nungambakkam

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 10 August 2026
Article Assistant

Suraj Garg and Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 August 2026
CA Article Trainee

ASC Group

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 September 2026
Articles

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants

Mumbai

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
14 August 2026
Semi Qualified

Goyanka & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
13 August 2026
Chartered Accountant (FP&A)

Client of Trellis Consulting

Gurgaon

CA

View Details