Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Alex Tour and Travel Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner, CGST [W.P.(C) NO. 5722 OF 2023 dated May 8, 2023] directed the Revenue department to disburse the assessee's refund claim along with interest as payable and hel

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Makhijani Pushpak Harish v. The State of Gujarat [SLP (CRL.) No. 2868 of 2023 dated April 19, 2023] set aside the order passed by the Superintendent which was modified by the Gujarat High Court directing the assessee to f

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in Rajesh Mangal v. C.C.E. & S.T.-Ahmedabad-III [Excise Appeal No. 11712 of 2013-DB dated June 15, 2023] held that the demand for Excise Duty would be valid if the Assessee was aware that the transaction was done without the pay

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in M/s. Aegis Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Surat-I [Service Tax Appeal No. 13528 of 2013-DB dated June 09, 2023] held that services which were consumed outside India, the out of scope of service tax and any ta

The CESTAT, New Delhi in Sowar Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax [Final Order No. 50607 Of 2023 dated March 29,2023] held that assessee has not received any consideration for providing corporate guarantee and hence no service tax is payable by

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in United India Shipping Services v. Commissioner of GST and Central Excise [Service Tax Appeal no. 42191 of 2015 dated June 12, 2023]set aside the order confirming demand on expenses like deconsolidation charges, transportation

Any person claiming refund of any duty of excise may make an application for refund of such duty to the Assistant Collector of Central Excise before the expiry of one year from the relevant date in such form as may be prescribed and the application s

Cheque issued at the time ,when company not became sick , but at the time of payment the company became sick and cheque had been dishonoured. The directors of the Company are liable and be prosecuted under provisions of Section 138 of the Negotiable

The petition filed by Operational Debtor has been dismissed by the NCLT on the contention of existing dispute raised by Corporate Debtor. The NCLAT revised the order passed by NCLT and allowed the petition since Corporate Debtor was trying to take ad

The present appeal was directed against the final order passed by the High Court of Karnataka (hereinafter referred to as "High Court"), wherein the High Court partly allowed the appeal of the Appellant and assessed the income as Rs.8000/- per month