No excise duty demand on differential value of stock of finished or semi-finished goods
Court :
CESTAT Bangalore
Brief :
The CESTAT Bangalore in M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Central Excise [Appeal No. E/562/2008 dated May 25, 2023] set aside the order demanding excise duty on differential quantity of goods based on the ER-1 returns as against the quantity of goods shown in the audited books of accounts. Held that, discrepancy on comparison of values stated in RG-1 and the physical stock statement prepared by the assessee is inherently inaccurate because both are estimated value.
Citation :
Appeal No. E/562/2008 dated May 25, 2023]
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Broadcasts
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited Judgements Access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
Bimal Jain
Published in Excise
Views : 349
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
