Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India


Limitation Act

  Arbind Aggarwal    15 January 2009 at 20:43

MUMBAI, SEPT 10, 2008 : THE issue was already decided by the Supreme Court in COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE, NOIDA Vs M/s PUNJAB FIBRES LTD, NOIDA - 2008-TIOL-24-SC-CX.

Posted in Excise |   2699 Views


Cenvat Credit of Canteen Services

  Arbind Aggarwal    15 January 2009 at 20:43

Held by Larger Bench:- · It is well settled that every clause of the Statute should be construed with reference to the context in which it is issued. A bare mechanical interpretation of words and application of legislative intent is devoid of conce

Posted in Service Tax |   8983 Views



Surcharge on block assessment cases whether retrospective from 01.06.2002 or not - matter refered to larger bench in SC.

Posted in Income Tax  1 comments |   2552 Views


Amortization of Preliminary expenses

  CA. A. Kumar    11 January 2009 at 14:46

Case Fact: Whether interest earned on share application money can be set off with Public issue expenses?

Posted in Income Tax |   56 Views



Section 11 of Income-tax Act, 1961 – Charitable or religious trust – Exemption of Income from property held under – Assessment years 1996-97 and 2001-02 – Assessee was registered under section 12A as a charitable society – While making its assessment

Posted in Income Tax |   38 Views



The IT authority does not assume any power to enter the business premises/Office of the CA/Lawyer/Tax Practitioner to conduct survey under section 133A of IT Act in connection with survey of the premises of their client unless the client state in th

Posted in Income Tax |   58 Views


WDV of resulting comaony -Sec 32

  Jitender    11 January 2009 at 14:46

Section 32, read with section 43(6), of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Depreciation - Allowance/Rate of - Assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04 - Whether for purpose of computing depreciation, only tax written down value of transferred assets of demerged

Posted in Income Tax  2 comments |   51 Views



Upheld the order of the Tribunal, which concluded that the reasoning given by the Finance Company for accepting deposits in cash was a genuine and bona fide transactions and held that if the transaction was a genuine and bona fide transaction, that

Posted in Income Tax |   50 Views



Only employer and employee relationship is not envisaged to allow the premium paid on Keyman Insurance Policy as business expenditure and there can exist other types of relationship; consequently, Keyman Insurance Premium paid by the firm on the life

Posted in Income Tax |   65 Views



PFH mall and retail management ltd Vs. I.T.O. 05/11/2007 [2008] 298 ITR (AT) 371(Kolkata)

Posted in Income Tax |   41 Views



CCI Pro
Follow us