Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The appellant had filed an application dated July 16, 2020 (received by SEBI on July 22, 2020) under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (“RTI Act”). The respondent, by a letter dated August 14, 2020, responded to the application filed by the appellan

Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘SEBI’) received complaints from various investors inter- alia alleging that they had invested in Non-Convertible Redeemable Debentures (‘NCD’s’) issued by Siya-Ram Agro Industries Lt

The appellant had filed an application dated July 16, 2020 (received by SEBI on July 22, 2020) under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (“RTI Act”). The respondent, by a letter dated August 14, 2020, responded to the application filed by the appellan

Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as "SEBI") initiated adjudication proceedings under Section 15D(a) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as "SEBI Act"), the alleged violations

Oasis Tradelink Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘OTL’), is a company listed on Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (BSE). Securities and Exchange Board of India (‘SEBI’) had conducted an investigation in the matter of trading in the scrip of the OTL by

Oasis Tradelink Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘OTL’), is a company listed on Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (BSE). Securities and Exchange Board of India (‘SEBI’) had conducted an investigation in the matter of trading in the scrip of the OTL by

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of M/s Vianaar Homes Pvt. Ltd [W.P.(C) 2245/2020 & CM APPL. 7832/2020 dated November 3, 2020] has held that Section 174(2)(e) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("CGST Act"), specifically empowers

The Hon'ble HC, Gujarat in Cosmo Films India v. Union of India &Ors. [R/SLP No. 15833/2018 dated October 20, 2020] upheld the validity of rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 ("CGST Rules") and rules that notification is requ

This is an appeal by the assessee wherein the Revenue is aggrieved that the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-45, Mumbai (‘ld.CIT(A) for short) dated 27.02.2019 has reduced the addition for bogus purchase of Rs.5,82,838/- done by the Asses

This is an appeal by the Revenue wherein the Revenue is aggrieved that the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-26, Mumbai (‘ld.CIT(A) for short) dated 29.03.2019 has reduced the addition for bogus purchase of Rs.4,24,081/- done by the Assess