Bank of India, Mumbai Vs. JT. CIT (OSD)-2(1)(1), Mumbai
Last updated: 10 October 2020
Court :
ITAT Mumbai
Brief :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order passed by Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -2 (in short ‘PCIT’) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’)for assessment year 2014-15 dated 27.03.2018.
Citation :
ITA NO. 3699/MUM/2018
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI BENCH “B”, MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA NO. 3699/MUM/2018 : A.Y : 2014-15
Bank of India 8 th floor, Taxation Department, Star House, C-5, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai 400 051. PAN : AAACB0472C (Appellant)
Vs.
JCIT (OSD) – 2(1)(1), Mumbai. (Respondent)
Assessee by : Shri C. Naresh
Revenue by : Shri Rahul Raman, CIT-DR
Date of Hearing : 15/09/2020
Date of Pronouncement : 05/10/2020
O R D E R
PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, A.M
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order passed by Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -2 (in short ‘PCIT’) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’)for assessment year 2014-15 dated 27.03.2018.
2. At the time of hearing, the ld. DR submitted that the appeal filed by the assessee involves transfer pricing issue and he requested that this matter be transferred to transfer pricing bench and he filed a letter in this regard on 12.02.2020, which is placed on record. However, we noted that this appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of ld. PCIT passed under Section 263 of the Act, which is on jurisdiction issue and not on transfer pricing issue, therefore, we rejected the submissions of ld. DR and proceeded to hear the appeal.
To know more in details find the attachment file
Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 118
downloaded 235 times
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
