Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The captioned appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to assessment year 2011-12, is directed against the order passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Valsad in appeal no. CIT(A)/VLS/59/14-15 dated 18.08.2015, which in turn arises out

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 02/11/2016 passed by CIT(A)- Ghaziabad, for Assessment Year 2012-13.

This batch of appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against the separate orders of the ld. CIT(A)-26, New Delhi, relating to different assessment years as mentioned above

The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in Madras Bar Association v. Union of India & Anr. [Writ Petition (C) No.804 of 2020, (dated November 27, 2020)] upheld the validity of Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India &Ors. [W.P. (C) No. 961 of 2018 dated December 3, 2020] held that lottery and gambling under GST’s ambit is legally valid, upholding validity of tax imposition on lottery

The petitioner, an authorized agent, for sale and distribution of lotteries organized by State of Punjab has filed this writ petition impugning the definition of goods under Section 2(52) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and consequential

These are two appeals filed by the Revenue against two separate orders of the ld. CIT (A)-1, Jodhpur (camp at Jaipur) dated 20.09.2018 for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 respectively and the appeal filed by the assessee being ITA No. 284/JP

This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) has been preferred by the revenue. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment year 2007-08. The appeal was admitted by a bench

These appeals at the instance of the assessees are directed against CIT(A)’s order, both dated 14.09.2018. The relevant assessment year is 2008-2009.

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 23.10.2017 passed by Ld. CIT(A)-6, Bengaluru and it relates to assessment year 2013-14. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the disallowance of Rs.53,52,