banner_ad

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., Sambalpur Vs DCIT, Circle-2(1), Sambalpur


Last updated: 27 November 2020

Court :
ITAT Cuttak Bench

Brief :
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against order of CIT(A), Sambalpur, dated 28.03.2018 for the assessment year 2015-2016, on the following grounds of appeal :-

Citation :
ITA No.174/CTK/2018


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI L.P. SAHU, AM
ITA No.174/CTK/2018
Assessment Year : 2015 - 2016)

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd.,Jagriti Vihar, Burla,Sambalpur
PAN No. : AABCM 5188 P
Appellant)

Vs.
DCIT, Circle-2(1), Sambalpur
Respondent)

Assessee by : Shri S.S.Podar, CA
Revenue by : Shri S.M.Keshkamat, CITDR
Date of Hearing : 15/01/2020
Date of Pronouncement : 05/06/2020

O R D E R

Per L.P.Sahu, AM :

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against order of CIT(A), Sambalpur, dated 28.03.2018 for the assessment year 2015-2016, on the following grounds of appeal :- 

1. That the assessment order U/s.143(3) passed by the Learned Assessing Officer as well as the appellate order passed by the Learned CIT(Appeals), Cuttack, to the extent prejudicial to the assessee, is unjustified, arbitrary, excessive, contrary to evidences and bad in law. 

2. That the Learned Assessing Officer as well as CIT (Appeals) has not provided sufficient opportunity to the assessee to present its case with all evidences.

3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the authorities below has erred in making/upholding followings additions/ disallowances in full/part:

4. That the Ld. Authorities below has further erred in allowing short credit of TDS. 

5. That the Learned Authorities below would have provided sufficient opportunity to the assessee to explain its case with proper evidences. 

6. That the authorities below would not have made addition/disallowances on different heads of accounts as mentioned above and would have allowed all claims. 

7. That the Authorities below would have allowed the total credit of TDS.

8. That the authorities below would have accepted the returned income. 

9. That the appellant craves leave to add, amend or alter the aforesaid grounds of appeal before or at the time of hearing of the appeal.

To know more in details find the attachment file

 

CCI Pro

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 111
downloaded 240 times

Comments




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news


Company
22 May 2026
Audit assistant

Displayandbeyond

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
01 June 2026
Audit, Taxation & Compliance Executive

R P S K & Associates

Nashik

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 27 May 2026
Lead Conversion Executive / Sales Closing Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
22 May 2026
Sr. Financial Analyst - Consolidation

Search Synergy

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
26 May 2026
Senior Accountant cum purchase Manager

Vardhaman Group of India

Pimpri Chinchwad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
26 May 2026
Audit executive

vdsr & co LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
23 May 2026
Article Assistant

Geeta Manchanda & CO.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 May 2026
Article, CA & Paid Assistant Positions

Aggarwal Sarawagi and Co

New Delhi

CA

View Details