Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., Sambalpur Vs DCIT, Circle-2(1), Sambalpur


Quick Summary
This appeal concerns Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. challenging the assessment order and appellate order for the 2015-2016 tax year. The company argues that the authorities below made unjustified additions and disallowances, failed to provide sufficient opportunity to present evidence, and incorrectly calculated TDS credit. They seek acceptance of their returned income.

Court :
ITAT Cuttak Bench

Brief :
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against order of CIT(A), Sambalpur, dated 28.03.2018 for the assessment year 2015-2016, on the following grounds of appeal :-

Citation :
ITA No.174/CTK/2018


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI L.P. SAHU, AM
ITA No.174/CTK/2018
Assessment Year : 2015 - 2016)

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd.,Jagriti Vihar, Burla,Sambalpur
PAN No. : AABCM 5188 P
Appellant)

Vs.
DCIT, Circle-2(1), Sambalpur
Respondent)

Assessee by : Shri S.S.Podar, CA
Revenue by : Shri S.M.Keshkamat, CITDR
Date of Hearing : 15/01/2020
Date of Pronouncement : 05/06/2020

O R D E R

Per L.P.Sahu, AM :

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against order of CIT(A), Sambalpur, dated 28.03.2018 for the assessment year 2015-2016, on the following grounds of appeal :- 

1. That the assessment order U/s.143(3) passed by the Learned Assessing Officer as well as the appellate order passed by the Learned CIT(Appeals), Cuttack, to the extent prejudicial to the assessee, is unjustified, arbitrary, excessive, contrary to evidences and bad in law. 

2. That the Learned Assessing Officer as well as CIT (Appeals) has not provided sufficient opportunity to the assessee to present its case with all evidences.

3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the authorities below has erred in making/upholding followings additions/ disallowances in full/part:

4. That the Ld. Authorities below has further erred in allowing short credit of TDS. 

5. That the Learned Authorities below would have provided sufficient opportunity to the assessee to explain its case with proper evidences. 

6. That the authorities below would not have made addition/disallowances on different heads of accounts as mentioned above and would have allowed all claims. 

7. That the Authorities below would have allowed the total credit of TDS.

8. That the authorities below would have accepted the returned income. 

9. That the appellant craves leave to add, amend or alter the aforesaid grounds of appeal before or at the time of hearing of the appeal.

To know more in details find the attachment file

FAQ :

The appeal by Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. challenges the assessment order and appellate order regarding tax additions, disallowances, and TDS credit for the 2015-2016 assessment year.

The grounds include that the assessment and appellate orders were unjustified, insufficient opportunity was given to present evidence, and there were errors in additions/disallowances and TDS credit.

The appellant claims errors in making/upholding additions/disallowances, allowing short credit of TDS, and not providing sufficient opportunity to explain their case with evidence.

The appellant wishes for the authorities below to have not made the additions/disallowances, allowed all claims, provided full TDS credit, and accepted the returned income.

 

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 113
downloaded 280 times

Comments




CCI Pro