The captioned appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the respective orders passed by the CIT(A)-3, Mumbai, dated 19.03.2018 and 21.08.2019 for A.Y. 2014-15 and A.Y. 2016-17, respectively, which in turn arises from the respective assessmen
Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as “SEBI”) had received certain complaints from New Delhi Television Limited (hereinafter referred to as “NDTV”) on July 16, 2013 (1st complaint), December 27, 2013 (2nd complaint) and J
Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering, Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Department, Tax Tower, Thiruvananthapuram-695002. 2. Director General of Anti-Profiteering, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs, 2nd Floor, Bhai Vir Sing
M/s. Pareena Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., C-7A, 2nd Floor, Omax City Center Mall, Sohna Road, Sector-49, Gurugram (Haryana)-122002
Sri B.R. Sridhar (called as the 'Applicant' hereinafter), No.2328, 1st Floor, 20th Cross, Banashankari 2nd Stage, K.R.Road, Bangalore-560070, an un-registered person have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017 read
Director-General of Anti-Profiteering, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs, 2nd Floor, Bhai Vir Singh Sahitya Sadan, Bhai Vir Singh Marg, Gole Market, New Delhi-110001.
At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST, Act 2017 and SGST, Act 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a me
This Court is once again, within the span of a year, called upon to decide the constitutionality of various provisions concerning the selection, appointment, tenure, conditions of service, and ancillary matters relating to various tribunals, 19 in nu
Shri Kumudchandra Atmaram Patel, 47648 Sagar Apartment, Opp. Bhaysar Hostel, Nava Vadaj, Ahmedabad, Gujarat-380013.
The Hon'ble High Court of Bombay, in Parle International Limited v. Union of India and others [Writ Petition No.12904 of 2019, (dated, November 26, 2020)] held that, the commencement of adjudication proceedings after an inordinate delay of 13 years p