Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The above two appeals by the assessee are preferred against the common order of the CIT(A) – 4, Kanpur dated 30.11.2018 pertaining to A.Ys 2013-14 and 2014-15. The underlying facts in issues are identical. Therefore, both these appeals are disposed o

Having regard to the Customs Tariff Act 1975 as amended from time to time (hereinafter referred as the Act) and the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Antidumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rule

Heard Sri Sandeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Avinash Chandra Tripathi, learned counsel for the State-respondents.

This appeal by the assessee emanates from the order passed by the CIT(A)-3, Pune on 01-07-2016 in relation to the assessment year 2005-06.

Heard Sri A.P. Mathur, counsel for the petitioner, Sri B.K.S. Raghuvansi, counsel for the respondents and perused the record.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Aurangabad, dated 27-07-2017 in relation to the assessment year 2014-15.

This appeal by the assessee emanates from the order passed by the CIT(A)-8, Pune on 07-05-2018 in relation to the assessment year 2009-10.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-7, Pune, dated 18-01-2018 in relation to the assessment year 2013-14.

This appeal by the assessee emanates from the order passed by the CIT(TDS), Pune on 25-09-2019 in relation to the assessment year 2019-20.

This appeal filed by the Assessee against the Order of Ld. CIT(A)-24, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2012-13 dated25.7.2016 wherein, the addition of Rs. 2,44,00,000/- made by the AO with respect to the closing stock was upheld. Assessee by Sh. Shashwa