ITA No. 4657/Del/ 2014 and ITA No. 5091 Del 2014 are cross appeals by the assessee and the revenue preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-LTU, New Delhi dated 30.06.2014 pertaining to assessment year 1997-98. Both these appeals were heard together
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Vadodara dated 17.01.2017 for the assessment year 2008-09.
The captioned appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to assessment year 2011-12, is directed against the order passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Valsad in appeal no. CIT(A)/VLS/59/14-15 dated 18.08.2015, which in turn arises out
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 02/11/2016 passed by CIT(A)- Ghaziabad, for Assessment Year 2012-13.
This batch of appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against the separate orders of the ld. CIT(A)-26, New Delhi, relating to different assessment years as mentioned above
The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in Madras Bar Association v. Union of India & Anr. [Writ Petition (C) No.804 of 2020, (dated November 27, 2020)] upheld the validity of Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India &Ors. [W.P. (C) No. 961 of 2018 dated December 3, 2020] held that lottery and gambling under GST’s ambit is legally valid, upholding validity of tax imposition on lottery
The petitioner, an authorized agent, for sale and distribution of lotteries organized by State of Punjab has filed this writ petition impugning the definition of goods under Section 2(52) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and consequential
These are two appeals filed by the Revenue against two separate orders of the ld. CIT (A)-1, Jodhpur (camp at Jaipur) dated 20.09.2018 for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 respectively and the appeal filed by the assessee being ITA No. 284/JP
This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) has been preferred by the revenue. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment year 2007-08. The appeal was admitted by a bench