Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

This appeal in ITA No.5654/Mum/2017 for A.Y.2012-13 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-29, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-29/IT-196/ITO-18(2)(4)/15-16 dated 28/04/2015 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assess

These appeals in ITA No.7105/Mum/2017, 7106/Mum/2017, 7107/Mum/2017 & 7108/Mum/2017 for A.Y.2009-10, 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2008-09 arise out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-50, Mumbai in appeal Nos.CIT(A)-50/IT-73/2016-17-AY

These two appeals pertain to the same assessee, involve a common issue regarding taxation of ESOP benefit and were heard together. All the relevant material facts are admittedly the same, except for a variation in the quantum of ESOP benefits brought

At the time of hearing of captioned appeal, none appeared for assessee. However, vide assessee’s counsel letter as placed onrecord, it transpires that the assessee is opting to settle the dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme),

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in S.S. Industries v. Union of India [R/Special Civil Application No. 8841 of 2020 with R/Special Civil Application No. 8163 of 2020 decided on December 24, 2020] upheld the Directorate General of Goods & Services Tax I

These two appeals pertain to the same assessee, involve a common issue regarding taxation of ESOP benefit and were heard together. All the relevant material facts are admittedly the same, except for a variation in the quantum of ESOP benefits brought

At the time of hearing of captioned appeal, none appeared forassessee. However, vide assessee’s counsel letter as placed on record, it transpires that the assessee is opting to settle the disputeunder Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme),

This appeal in ITA No.3788/Mum/2018 for A.Y.2014-15 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-10/DC-5(1)(1)/390/16-17 dated 20/02/2018 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment

This appeal in ITA No.4980/Mum/2018 for A.Y.2008-09 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Mumbaiin appeal No.CIT(A)-4(e)-file-33/DCIT-2(1)(1)/2016-17 dated 17/07/2018(ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of asse

By way of this appeal, the assessee challenges the validity ofrevisional jurisdiction u/s 263 as exercised by learned Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax-33, Mumbai [in short referred to as ‘Pr.CIT’], for Assessment Year [in short referred to as ‘AY’] 201