Addition of undisclosed investment u/s 69 cannot be made purely on possibility of higher payment on the basis of comparables of higher market value.

Last updated: 22 January 2021
Quick Summary
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has ruled that an addition of undisclosed investment under section 69 cannot be made solely based on the possibility of a higher payment suggested by comparable properties with higher market values. This decision clarifies that mere speculation or potential for higher gains is insufficient grounds for such tax assessments. The ruling addresses several appeals related to undisclosed income, capital gains, and loans.

Court :
ITAT Mumbai

Brief :
These are appeals by the various assessees belonging to the same group and one appeal by the revenue against respective orders of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short learned CIT(A)] for the concerned assessment years.

Citation :
I.T.A. No. 6519/Mum/2019

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)

3 Months PLAN
999
(Excl. of GST ₹179)

View all CCI PRO benefits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. CESTAT: Service Tax Demand Based Solely on ITR Data Unsustainable; 40% Valuation Applicable to Original Works Contract
  2. CESTAT: Renting Vehicles on Per-Trip Basis Not Taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods
  3. CESTAT Denies Refund of Ocean Freight Service Tax Claim Filed Beyond Limitation
  4. CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Merely on Form 26AS; Renting of Residential Hostel Held Non-Taxable
  5. CESTAT: Rajasthan Sales Tax Subsidy under RIPS 2010 Not includible in Excise Assessable Value
  6. CESTAT: Late Payment Charges in the Nature of Interest Not Taxable as Declared Service
  7. CESTAT: Educational Services Exempt Under Section 66D; Extended Period Cannot Be Invoked Without Wilful Suppression
  8. CESTAT: No Service Tax on Royalty under RCM if Mining Lease Was Executed Before 1 April 2016
  9. No pre-deposit required for filing appeal before the GSTAT against penalty-only orders where proceedings commenced prior to October 01 2025
  10. Refund cannot be withheld under Section 54(11) of the CGST Act merely because the Revenue contemplates filing an appeal

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member sudhakar kulkarnisudhakar kulkarniPro Member Pranab BanerjeePranab BanerjeePro Member Shubham JainShubham JainPro Member cgagroshg cgagroshgcgagroshg cgagroshgPro Member Dhananjay SinghDhananjay Singh
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 September 2026
Articles

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants

Mumbai

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
20 September 2026
Semi Qualified CA

Navin & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 August 2026
Senior Accountant

MG Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 25 August 2026
CA Article's

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 September 2026
Chartered Accountant

Aviv Global Private Limited

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details
Company
15 September 2026
Client-site CA associate

Aditya Muley and Co

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 21 September 2026
CA Article Assistant

KK & Company Chartered Accountant

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 September 2026
CA/Semi-CA/BCom

Pravin Sarvaiya

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details