Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in Shri Nandhi Dhall Mills India Pvt. Ltd. v. Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGST &Ors. [W.P. No. 5192 of 2020 and WMP. No. 6135 of 2020] directed the Revenue Department to refund the amount of INR 2 crore collected from

The Hon'ble AAR, Karnataka in Re: M/s Page Industries Limited [Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 54/2020 dated December 15, 2020] held that assessee is in essence not eligible to claim input tax credit ('ITC') on promotional products/materials and marketin

The Hon'ble Tripura High Court in Union of India v. M/S. Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. [Central Excise Appeal No.01/2019 and Central Excise Appeal No.02/2019, dated March 22, 2021] upheld the judgment passed by the CESTAT, Kolkata allowing the assessee to

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax v. Pepsi Foods Ltd. [Civil Appeal Nos. 1106 to 1139 of 2021 decided on April 6, 2021] has upheld the Hon'ble Delhi High Court's verdict of partially striking down third proviso to Section

The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Government of Kerala & Anr. v. Mother Superior Adoration Convent [Civil Appeal No. 202 of 2012 and others, decided on March 1, 2021] upheld the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Kerala High Court allowing the exemp

Aggrieved by the dismissal of their appeal by the  Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “CESTAT”), the assessee has come up with the present appeal under Section 35 L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

“It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated16.12.2020 passed in Revision Petition No. 97/2020, by thelearned District and Sessions Judge, West District, Tis HazariCourts, Delhi, a

This Appeal is filed against the order of acquittal inCriminal Appeal No.17/2002 on the file of Additional Sessions Court, Kozhikode. The first appellate court reversed the conviction and sentence passed under Sec.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Ac

The Hon'ble AAR Gujarat in M/s. Shree Arbuda Transport (Advance Ruling No.: GUJ/GAAR/R/82/2020 decided on September 17, 2020) has held that the provisions for seeking advance ruling is limited to the activities conducted byM/s. Shree Arbuda Transport

“It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’bleCourt be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated16.12.2020 passed in Revision Petition No. 97/2020, by thelearned District and Sessions Judge, West District, Tis HazariCourts, Delhi, an