Error in holding that no additions could be made u/s 153A on basis of statement recorded u/s 132(4) of the Act.


Quick Summary
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has reviewed appeals concerning additions made under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act. The core issue is whether statements recorded under Section 132(4) can form the sole basis for such additions. The Tribunal is examining the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)'s previous decision, which suggested that additions under Section 153A were restricted to material found during a search, and that statements alone were insufficient. This ruling clarifies the scope of the Assessing Officer's powers in reassessment proceedings following a search.

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
These appeals by Revenue are directed against three separate orders, all dated 22/03/2018, passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-30, New Delhi [in short “the Ld. CIT(A)”] for assessment years 2009-10, 2011-12 and 2013-14 respectively. In these appeals, a common dispute is involved and therefore, these appeals were heard together anddisposed off by way of this consolidated order for convenience.

Citation :
ITA 4226/DEL/2018

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI

BEFORE SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND
SHRI K.N. CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
[Through Video Conferencing]

ITA No.4223/Del./2018
Assessment Year: 2009-10
And
ITA No.4225/Del./2018
Assessment Year: 2011-12
And
ITA No.4226/Del./2018
Assessment Year: 2013-14 

ACIT,
Central Circle-30,
New Delhi
(Appellant) 

Vs. 

M/s. Kuber Khadyan Pvt.
Ltd.,
1/8, West Patel Nagar,
New Delhi
PAN :AABCK0600L
(Respondent) 

Appellant by Ms. Aashna Paul, CIT(DR)
Respondent by Shri P.C. Yadav, Adv.

Date of hearing 15.03.2021
Date of pronouncement 26.03.2021

ORDER

PER O.P. KANT, AM:

These appeals by Revenue are directed against three separate orders, all dated 22/03/2018, passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-30, New Delhi [in short “the Ld. CIT(A)”] for assessment years 2009-10, 2011-12 and 2013-14 respectively. In these appeals, a common dispute is involved and therefore, these appeals were heard together anddisposed off by way of this consolidated order for convenience.

ITA No.4223/Del./2018 for AY : 2009-10

2. First, we take up the appeal of the Revenue (ITA No.4223/Del/2018) for assessment year 2009-10. The grounds raised in the appeal are reproduced as under: 

1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in holding that no additions could be made u/s 153A on the basis of statement recorded u/s 132(4) and the power of the AO to assess or reassess total income u/s 153 A is restricted to the material found during search.

2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in relying upon the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Singhad Technical Education Society when the facts and circumstances of the instant case are different from that case.

3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred by ignoring the fact that the assessee during the assessment proceedings failed to produce the Directors of the company that gave accommodation entries to the assessee company and thereby failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the credits received in their books of account.

To know more in details find the attachment file
 

FAQ :

The main dispute concerns whether additions can be made under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act based solely on a statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Act.

The Ld. CIT(A) had previously held that no additions could be made under Section 153A on the basis of a statement recorded under Section 132(4), and that the Assessing Officer's power was restricted to material found during a search.

Section 153A deals with the assessment in case of search or requisition, allowing for the assessment or reassessment of total income.

Section 132(4) pertains to the power to examine persons during a search and allows for the recording of statements, which can be used as evidence.

The appeal grounds mention that the assessee failed to produce the directors of the companies that provided accommodation entries, thereby failing to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the credits.

 

Comments




CCI Pro



Company
19 September 2026
CA/Semi-CA/BCom

Pravin Sarvaiya

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 September 2026
CA Article Trainee

SR BAGAI & Co.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 September 2026
Industrial Trainee

Twenty Point Nine Five Ventures Private Limited

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
18 September 2026
Accounts & Finance Specialist

ULTRA CHEMICAL WORKS

Thane

CA Final

View Details
Company
28 August 2026
Audit Manager

K A R M & CO

Mumbai

CMA

View Details
Company
08 September 2026
Audit Executive

Thammana & Associates

Srikakulam

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 25 August 2026
CA Article's

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 September 2026
Accounts Executive

Hema Yashwanth & Associates

Chennai

B.Com

View Details