Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against CIT(A) – 3, Hyderabad’s order dated 14/10/2019 for AY 2016-17 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ; in short “the Act” on the following grounds:

This is Revenue’s appeal for the A.Y 2009-10 against the order of the CIT (A)-2, Guntur, dated 31.10.2019.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against CIT(A) – 5, Hyderabad’s order, dated 16/12/2019 for AY 2016-17 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ; in short “the Act”.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against CIT(A), Kurnool’s order dated 23/12/2019 for AY 2016-17 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act,1961 ; in short “the Act” on the following grounds:

The Hon’ble Bombay HC in Dharmendra M. Jani v. Union of India [W.P.  No. 2031 of 2018 dated June 09, 2021] Justice Ujjal Bhuyan held that Section 13(8)(b) of the Integrated Goods and Services Act, 2017 ('the IGST Act') is ultra vires of Articles 14,

The Hon’ble High Court, Madras in Mohammed Haroon Shaik Mohammed v. the Additional Commissioner of Customs [WP (MD) Nos. 3917 & 3918 of 2020 and WMP (MD) No. 5459 of 2021 decided on April 26, 2020] held that the assessable person cannot be denied acc

 This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year NIL is directed against the order of learned DIT(Exemptions), Delhi dated 19.07.2011. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:-

Aggrieved by the order dated 19.03.2018 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, New Delhi ("Ld. CIT(A)") for the assessment year 2013-14, Modern Papers (“the assessee”) filed this appeal.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 30th June,2016 of the CIT(A), Muzaffarnagar, relating to assessment year 2012-13.

These three appeals of three different assessees are being taken up together as in each of these appeals pertaining to 2011-12 assessment years, the issues and arguments remain identical. Accordingly, on the request of the parties, common order in al