Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhand concluding on the issue, held that- whether Competent Authority had misconstrued the observations made by the High Court in order dated February 21, 2019 held that it is well-settled in law that any one intentional

In State vs. Yogesh Kumar Goyal [Bail Application No. 1676/21 dated August 31, 2021], Yogesh Kumar Goyal ("the Applicant") has filed the current bail application - against FIR No. DZU/INV/GST/A894/2021, made against him under Section 132 (1) (b) & (c

Leaned counsel relies on the judgment passed by the High Court of Delhi and this Court in writ petition No.6047/2021 M/s Devgiri Exports Vs. The Income Tax Officer as also the judgment passed by Supreme Court in Whirlpool Corporation Vs. Registrar of

Both these appeals filed by the assessee are directed against CIT(A) - 1 , Hyderabad’s separate orders dated 19/05/2017 for AY 2012-13 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) and 271(1)(c) of the Income- Tax Act.

All these appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against separate orders of CIT(A) for the AYs mentioned at Cause title involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income- Tax Act, 1961.

This is assessee�s appeal for the A.Y 2009-10 against the order of the CIT (A)-1, Hyderabad, dated 24.11.2017.

This appeal of Revenue is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-4, Hyderabad dated 28.09.2018 pertaining to A.Y. 2014-15.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against CIT(A) – 1, Hyderabad’s order dated 25/03/2019 for AY 2012-13 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) rws 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

This is assessee�s appeal for the A.Y 2015-16 against the order of the CIT (A)-3, Hyderabad, dated 7.2.2019 confirming the penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act.

This appeal of Revenue is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-3, Hyderabad dated 04.09.2019 pertaining to A.Y. 2016-17.