Anticipatory Bail denied for bailable offences as value of false ITC claimed being less than 5 crores


Last updated: 07 September 2021

Court :
Sessions Court, Rajkot

Brief :
In Amit Haresh Kumar Mehta v. Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI [Cr. M. A. No. 1486/2021 dated August 11, 2021], Amit Haresh Kumar Mehta ("the Applicant") has filed the current application seeking an Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("the Cr.P.C").

Citation :
Cr. M. A. No. 1486/2021 dated August 11, 2021

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
Buy CCI PRO Now

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 154
Share Report Abuse
Comments

Join CAclubindia WhatsApp Finance Community & stay updated with the latest TAX news, compliance alerts and important updates all in one place!

Recent Judgments :

  1. Supreme Court affirms the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act: No ITC to the recipient unless the supplier actually deposits tax to the Government
  2. No Addition under Income Tax Law on Bogus Purchases, Where Sales Are Accepted and Supplies Are Backed by GST Records and Banking Trail
  3. Voluntary Tax Payment Does Not Bar Proceedings Under Section 74 Where Suppression Allegation Remains Uncontested
  4. Appellate Authority Cannot Pass "Copy-Paste" Orders Without Independent Application of Mind
  5. Audit Closure Bars Reopening of Same Issues Under Section 73
  6. Big Relief ITC Cannot Be Denied to a Bona Fide Purchaser Merely Because the Supplier's Registration Cancelled Retrospectively
  7. ITC Cannot Be Denied Solely on the Ground that the Supplier was Subsequently Declared Non-Existent, Without Examining the Documentary Evidence Furnished by the Assessee
  8. GSTAT to Examine Whether Mandatory Pre-Deposit is Payable on Penalty Order Only Passed Prior to October 1, 2025
  9. No Further Pre-Deposit is Required Before the Appellate Tribunal Where the Amount Already Deposited Before the First Appellate Authority Exceeds the Specified Limit of Pre-Deposit Payable on the Reduced Demand
  10. Corporate Guarantee Without Consideration Not Taxable Under GST

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member Ankita AgrawalAnkita AgrawalPro Member Sivanath VVSivanath VVPro Member Steffi D'souzaSteffi D'souzaPro Member BARUN PALBARUN PALPro Member asmita guptaasmita gupta
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Follow us
add to google news

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
11 July 2026
CA semi qualified

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 July 2026
Article internship

AJAY SINGH AND CO LLP

Thane

CA Final

View Details
Company
14 July 2026
Senior Executive/ Manager

H S SHARMA AND CO

Pune

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 July 2026
Article Assistant

Sahil Agarwal & Company

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Taxation Content Writer Intern

Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
22 July 2026
Senior Chartered Accountant

SKSS

Patna

CA

View Details
Company
20 July 2026
Senior GST Executive

Chandak Agarwal & Co

Mumbai

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
06 July 2026
Chartered Accountant (Indirect Taxation)

Gowra Ventures Pvt Ltd

Hyderabad

CA

View Details