banner_ad

Advertisement charges paid to non-resident company cannot be considered as royalty


Last updated: 07 September 2021

Court :
Karnataka High Court

Brief :
In M/s. Myntra Designs Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax [IT(IT)A Nos.598 to 600/Bang/2020 dated September 3, 2021], M/s. Myntra Designs Pvt. Ltd. ("the Applicant") filed three appeals in Hon'ble ITAT, Bangalore challenging the common order dated March 16, 2020 ("the Order") passed by Ld. CIT(A), Bengaluru w.r.t. assessment years 2012-13 to 2015-16. In all the three years, the Ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the demand raised by the Assessing Officer ("the AO") under Section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the IT Act") along with interest under Section 201(1A) of the IT Act by treating the Applicant as an 'assessee in default' for non-deduction of tax at source ("TDS") from the payments made to M/s Facebook Ireland ("Non-resident Company")  towards advertisement fees.

Citation :
IT(IT)A Nos.598 to 600/Bang/2020 dated September 3, 2021

In M/s. Myntra Designs Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax [IT(IT)A Nos.598 to 600/Bang/2020 dated September 3, 2021], M/s. Myntra Designs Pvt. Ltd. ("the Applicant") filed three appeals in Hon'ble ITAT, Bangalore challenging the common order dated March 16, 2020 ("the Order") passed by Ld. CIT(A), Bengaluru w.r.t. assessment years 2012-13 to 2015-16. In all the three years, the Ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the demand raised by the Assessing Officer ("the AO") under Section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the IT Act") along with interest under Section 201(1A) of the IT Act by treating the Applicant as an 'assessee in default' for non-deduction of tax at source ("TDS") from the payments made to M/s Facebook Ireland ("Non-resident Company")  towards advertisement fees.

The Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relied upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of  Urban Ladder Home Décor Solutions Pvt Ltd (supra)v. ACIT [IT(IT)A No.615 to 620/Bang/2020 dated August 17, 2021]to hold that  the payments made by the Applicant to the Non-resident Company cannot be considered as "royalty payments" and hence, it does not give rise any income chargeable in India under the Indian IT Act. Held that there is no requirement to deduct TDS under Section 195 of the IT Act.

Further, noted that as per the definition of royalties contained in Article 12 of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement ("DTAA"), it is clear that there is no obligation on the persons mentioned in Section 195 of the IT Act to deduct TDS. Hence, the relevant DTAA provisions should be considered in the cases for determining the question whether the payments made by the Applicant are in the nature of Royalty or not.

Accordingly, set aside the Order passed by Ld. CIT(A) and directed the AO to delete the demand raised under Section 201(1) of the IT Act along with the interest charged under Section 201(1A) of the IT Act for all the three years under consideration. 

 

CCI Pro

Bimal Jain
Published in Income Tax
Views : 204

Comments




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news


Company
29 May 2026
Company Secretary - Part time

Shaswat initial support private limited

Ahmedabad

CS

View Details
Company
23 May 2026
Article Assistant

Geeta Manchanda & CO.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
16 May 2026
Audit clerk

mgirt & co

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
23 May 2026
Account Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
07 June 2026
Tax Associate

Rajkumar Jain & Co.

Ahmedabad

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 15 May 2026
Audit Assistant / Article Trainee / Intern

SSGS and Associates

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 27 May 2026
Lead Conversion Executive / Sales Closing Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
04 June 2026
Semi Qualified CA

Goyal Puneet & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details