Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -2, Chandigarh [ ( in short the ‘Ld. CIT(A) ] dated 10.01.2018 relating to assessment year 2013-14, passed u/s 250(6) of the

The present appeals have been preferred by the revenue against the order dated 24.04.2017 and 15.02.2019 passed u/s 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala [ ( in short the ‘Ld. Pr. CIT dated 31.03.2021 relating to assessment year 2017-18.

The present appeals relate to the same assessee and are against separate orders both dated 31.03.2021 of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central ) , Ludhiana( in short referred to as “PCIT” ) , passed in exercise of his revisionary jurisdic

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) , Delhi [ ( in short the ‘Ld. CIT(A) ] Nat ional Faceless Appeal Centre dated 25.05.2021

The instant appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 08.05.2018 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-10, Ahmedabad arising out of the order dated 24.10.2016 passed by the ITO, Ward-1(2)(5), Ahmedabad under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the

The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-1, Vadodara (“CIT(A)” in short) dated 09.09.2019 passed for Assessment Year 2015-16.

The Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-2, Ahmedabad (“CIT(A)” in short) dated 14.08.2019 passed for Assessment Year 2013-14.

The Hon'ble Patna High Court, in M/s Manoj Kumar v. The State of Bihar and Ors. [Writ Petition No.17524 of 2021 decided on October 6, 2021] has held that a demand made under GST laws on the basis of orders passed where the assessee was not given a re

The Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in M/s Balaji Publicity vs. Union of India and others [WP No.3133/2021 and W.P. No.3130/2021 decided on October 5, 2021] has held that the Designated Committee under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Sche