Bombay HC: No TDS deductible by Builder on Refundable Amount paid to Home-Buyers


Last updated: 07 September 2021

Court :
Bombay High Court

Brief :
In Sainath Rajkumar Sarode and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. [WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 4804 OF 2020 dated August 18, 2021], Sainath Rajkumar Sarode ("the Petitioner") has been filed seeking directions for the recovery of arrears due to the Petitioners under a Recovery Warrant dated October 15, 2018 passed by the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority against Respondent Nos. 4 to 7.

Citation :
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 4804 OF 2020 dated August 18, 2021

In Sainath Rajkumar Sarode and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. [WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 4804 OF 2020 dated August 18, 2021], Sainath Rajkumar Sarode ("the Petitioner") has been filed seeking directions for the recovery of arrears due to the Petitioners under a Recovery Warrant dated October 15, 2018 passed by the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority against Respondent Nos. 4 to 7.

In the instant case, the Respondents 4 to 7 were to pay payment under the Recovery Warrant to the Petitioner in terms of installments. Nevertheless, for the instalment due on July 20, 2021, Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 deducted 10% of the amount, as tax deductible at source ("TDS") on the amount of interest under the Recovery Warrant and the Consent Terms.

The Petitioner contended that the amounts payable to the Petitioners under the Recovery Warrant is in the nature of a judgment debt, being compensatory amounts payable to the Petitioner, owing to the failure of Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 to satisfactorily discharge their contractual and statutory obligations under the Real Estate (Regulation & Development Act), 2016 ("RERA Act").

The Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 had submitted that they deducted the said amount as TDS as per the provisions of Section 194A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the IT Act"). They further stated that the TDS has not been filed before the concerned authority and that they have no objection to paying the amount deducted as TDS, to the Petitioners, so far as it is in compliance with the statutory provisions and no penalties are imposed upon these Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 due to non- payment of the same.

On perusal of all the facts and evidences in the case, the Honorable Bombay High Court adjudicated that the amount so payable is in the nature of a judgment debt, and the payment of which cannot establish a debtor-creditor relationship between the parties, therefore, the said sum or any part thereof cannot be liable to TDS under the relevant provisions of the IT Act.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in Income Tax
Views : 322

Comments




CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
ARTICLE ASSISTANT

BHUPINDER SHAH AND COMPANY

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 June 2026
Accounts Executive

Getfive Advisors Pvt. Ltd.

Ahmedabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Senior Account (VA Client Operations)

Karbon Business

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 June 2026
Article Assistant

Sharma Chetan And Company

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Taxation Content Writer Intern

Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
29 June 2026
Accountant (Finance & Compliance)

TRIEYEZ

Kolkata

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Article Assistant or Paid Assistant

VIKAS VERMA & CO

New Delhi

Others

View Details