Judgements by FCS Deepak Pratap Singh

NCLAT observed from the documentary evidence on record that no 'Charge' has been registered under Section 77(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Appellant 'Claim' was notsupported by the provisions under Regulation 21 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board

The Discretionary Power of Directors to refuse 'Transfer of Shares' is not to be resorted to in a deliberate or arbitrary fashion but in good faith. The Directors are to give due weightage to shareholder's right to transfer his share.

Provisions of Section 245(4) & (6) nowhere confer power to reduce or waive statutory liability of payment of interest u/s 234A, 234B & 234D by the settlement commission.

This is a landmark judgement of the Apex Court and the amendment in Hindu Succession Act,2005 ,which has changed family landscape of India. Earlier daughters have no right in the ancestral property of father and they are also no considered as coparce

It was held by the Apex Court proceedings against a director of the company in contraventions of provisions of FERA,1973 will be commenced based on the finding that the role of the said directors at the time when offence had committed. The director w

The Assessee also has the option of depositing this amount in Capital Gains Account Scheme as explained in Section 54 above, before the due date of furnishing the Income Tax Return.

In this case the refund to the assessee was due to order of CIT(A) and not the basis of regular assessment and hence interest under Section 234D is not leviable.

This appeal is against a judgment and order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT),whereby the learned Tribunal refused to stay the proceedings initiated by the Respondent, Axis Bank Limited against the Appellant for initiation

On an overall analysis of the facts involved and the part played by the Petitioner No.2 in the affairs of the Company at the relevant time, we are not inclined to interfere with the orders of the High Court or the Company Law Board, since we are not

This is a landmark judgement of the Apex Court in which it was held that the owner of the vehicle is expected to verify the driving skills and not run to the licensing authority to verify the genuineness of the driving license before appointing a dri