Judgements by Shivani

The captioned appeals being three (3) in number are directed against a common judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) dated 22.02.2008 ITA No.1367/2008 relates to Assessment Year 1991-1992; ITA No.1

The facts which revealed from the record are as under. The assessee is Co-operative Housing Society. The return filed by the assessee was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed u/s.143(3). It was also noticed by the A.O. that the assesse

The assessee is a public charitable trust. It is registered u/s 12A(a) of the Income Tax Act. Its income is eligible for exemption u/s 11 of the Act subject to the conditions specified therein. In the income and expenditure account submitted by the a

At the time of hearing of the appeal, neither the assessee nor any of his authorized representative were present, although, the last notice for hearing the appeal on 11.08.2011 was sent at the address given by the assessee in form no.36. The same has

(i) That the sustaining of disallowance of interest Rs. 1,61,226/- by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on the ground that assessee has made interest free advance of borrowed funds in arbitrary, unjust, unwarranted and at any rate very excessi

“(i) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 13,80,000/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of unsecured loans by accepting unsecured loan

In the grounds of appeal, the assessee has taken one legal plea that while rejecting the assessee’s application for renewal of exemption u/s 80G filed on 24.12.2011, the learned DIT(E) has ignored the amendment made in Section 80G(5)(vi) by the Finan

Facts of the case in brief are that the A.O. noted that the assessee has received Sales Tax incentive of Rs. 12,94,109/- in respect of Unit I and Sales Tax incentive of Rs. 84687/- in respect of Unit II on which deduction u/s 80IB has been claimed. A

The grounds of appeal raised by assessee read as under :- “1. For that the order of assessment as well as order of appeal is bad in law and should quashed. 2. For that the written submission filed in appeal was not considered. 3. For that the re