Judgements by Bimal Jain

The AAR, Gujarat, in M/s. Hilti Manufacturing India Pvt. Ltd. [Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/2023/26 dated July 12, 2023] held that, services provided by the assessee to the entities located outside India is covered under section 13(2) of the Integra

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in M/s Panoli Enviro Technology Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, SURAT-II [Service Tax Appeal No. 10813 of 2013-DB dated July 07, 2023] held that the effluent does not qualify to be a 'good' as per the Sales of Go

The Hon'ble Supreme court in the matter of State Tax Officer v. Shabu George (Ib) Special Leave Petition (SLP) No.27670/2023 dated July 31, 2023]dismissed the SLP filed by the Revenue Department against the order of the Hon'ble Kerela High Court orde

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in M/s.Margo Brush India & Ors. v. State of U.P[ Writ Tax No. 1580 of 2022 dated January 16, 2023] set aside the penalty order passed under Section 129(1)(b) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the

The AAR, Karnataka, in the case of Srisai Luxurious Stay LLP [Ruling No. KAR ADRG 25/2023 dated JULY 13, 2023] ruled that hostel and PG accommodation cannot be considered equivalent to residential accommodation and thus such services are not eligible

The AAAR, Maharashtra, in matter of M/s Chep India Private Limited [Order No. MAH/AAAR/DS-RM/02/2023-24 dated June 05, 2023] held that the transaction between two GSTINs of same person would be considered as lease transaction and accordingly taxable

The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. City Bank N.A. and Ors. [APO 10/2023 with WPO 547/2019 dated July 25, 2023] held that the loan facility availed by a credit card holder, where being a credit card holder is a condition for el

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter of M/s Chegg India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax [W.P.(c) 14886 of 2022 dated July 19, 2023] held that the refund application cannot be rejected without giving a proper reason a

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in M/s. Jivan Jyot Motors Pvt Ltd. [Service Tax Appeal No. 13811 of 2014-DB dated July 24, 2023] set aside the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority and held that no service tax can be demanded where Value Added Tax (VAT) w

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad, in Neeraj Sharma v. Commissioner of Customs, Kandla [Customs Appeal No. 12056 of 2018-DB dated July 24, 2023] set aside the order passed by the Adjudicating authority on that matter which is already been adjudicated and held su